Main Page

 

Canon EOS
 - EOS-1D Mark II N
 - EOS-1D Mark II
 - EOS-1D Mark III
 - EOS-1D
 - EOS-1Ds Mark II
 - EOS-1Ds Mark III
 - EOS-1Ds
 - EOS-10D
 - EOS-300D
 - EOS 5D
 - EOS 20D
 - EOS 20Da
 - EOS 30D
 - EOS 40D
 - EOS 350D
 - EOS 400D
 - EOS 450D
 - EOS 1000D
 - EOS-D30
 - EOS-D60
 
Canon Powershot
 - Powershot A10
 - Powershot A20
 - Powershot A30
 - Powershot A40
 - Powershot A50
 - Powershot A60
 - Powershot A70
 - Powershot A75
 - Powershot A80
 - Powershot A85
 - Powershot A95
 - Powershot A100
 - Powershot A200
 - Powershot A300
 - Powershot A310
 - Powershot A400
 - Powershot A410
 - Powershot A420
 - Powershot A430
 - Powershot A450
 - Powershot A460
 - Powershot A470
 - Powershot A510
 - Powershot A520
 - Powershot A530
 - Powershot A540
 - Powershot A550
 - Powershot A560
 - Powershot A570 IS
 - Powershot A580
 - Powershot A590 IS
 - Powershot A610
 - Powershot A620
 - Powershot A630
 - Powershot A640
 - Powershot A650 IS
 - Powershot A700
 - Powershot A710 IS
 - Powershot A720 IS
 - Powershot G1
 - Powershot G2
 - Powershot G3
 - Powershot G5
 - Powershot G6
 - Powershot G7
 - Powershot G9
 - Powershot Pro1
 - Powershot Pro90 IS
 - Powershot S1 IS
 - Powershot S2 IS
 - Powershot S3 IS
 - Powershot S5 IS
 - Powershot S10
 - Powershot S20
 - Powershot S30
 - Powershot S40
 - Powershot S45
 - Powershot S50
 - Powershot S60
 - Powershot S70
 - Powershot S80
 - Powershot S400
 - Powershot S430
 - Powershot S500
 - Powershot SD10
 - Powershot SD20
 - Powershot SD30
 - Powershot SD40
 - Powershot SD100
 - Powershot SD110
 - Powershot SD200
 - Powershot SD300
 - Powershot SD400
 - Powershot SD430
 - Powershot SD450
 - Powershot SD500
 - Powershot SD550
 - Powershot SD600
 - Powershot SD630
 - Powershot SD700 IS
 - Powershot SD750
 - Powershot SD770
 - Powershot SD790
 - Powershot SD800 IS
 - Powershot SD850 IS
 - Powershot SD870 IS
 - Powershot SD890 IS
 - Powershot SD900
 - Powershot SD950 IS
 - Powershot SD1000
 - Powershot SD1100 IS
 - Powershot SX100 IS
 - Powershot TX1
 
Canon Digital Ixus
 - Ixus
 - Ixus 300
 - Ixus 330
 - Ixus v
 - Ixus v2
 - Ixus v3






 

Review Canon EOS 400D

08-08-2008 / A and lk
If you use the card-reader, he would not change the quality of R A W???


User Rating: 108-08-2008 / Nobody

For 07-08-2008 / Dima
More specifically, that over the lens?


User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Dima

Faced with this problem: on my 400D with whale lens aperture not less than 4.5 exposed, well т.е.не opens polnostyu.pereproboval all regimes - does not help ((either 4 or 3.5 or put! Although in the first couple months after buying everything was OK. подскажите pliz: this bug or what, I do not do so? thanks.


User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Dima

Faced with this problem: on my 400D with whale lens aperture not less than 4.5 exposed, well т.е.не opens polnostyu.pereproboval all regimes - does not help ((either 4 or 3.5 or put! Although in the first couple months after buying everything was OK. подскажите pliz: this bug or what, I do not do so? thanks.


User Rating: 107-08-2008 / OLGA

Thank you especially great DENISU and those with him leading cultural dialogue for detailed recommendations.
I once examine photos, but met on vacation and urgently want to change the film Minoltu (zerkalka semi-), before that (before'95) was Zenit, like to shoot nature, but now - children, and made portraits and premises.
Yet in the recommendations of several confusing. Understand that I look for-any Cannon, could specify that for my goals to take better approx $ 800 - $ 1000 and after that I was disappointed in the figure, may leave the film?
ALL zhelchenostsam: let's pokulturnee and poblagodarnee be at each other ... it takes less time and text.


User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Nobody

For 05-08-2008 / Alka
Try cleaning contacts usb-ports on the cable and competence. Try to change himself usb-cable. Try to connect to another photo of competence.
If not help - bear back into the photo shop.


User Rating: 105-08-2008 / Alka

The people did not see the 450d planted all P.0.ustanovleno, podklyuchaesh through usb and nichego.Spasite! What may be the reason?


User Rating: 105-08-2008 / Yuri

Take with a fixed focal length 50mm f/1.8 or reliable 50mm f/1.4, excellent quality, but there is no zoom at all. While perhaps will miss the wide angle to the walls (if it is a great painting a room is not large)


User Rating: 103-08-2008 / Vitali

Please advise lens for quality peresemki paintings and murals sten.Zum nenuzhen.Zaranee big thank you.


User Rating: 102-08-2008 / Sergey

Feelings will be disgruntled schas cheers, but still dare to ask: And if you take the D400 and G9 and withdraw to the mountains or automatic say sea, which fotik give more extensive and beautiful picture?


User Rating: 102-08-2008 / Nobody

As "tezisno describe the main pros? Proffesionalny fix by 85 mm, is very wide aperture. With the motor. Very fast, very sharp. Net portretnik. Only very expensive, but still expensive L series lenses. In line "lenses" is a pair of entries and a short description.
There is much cheaper analog - EF 85mm f/1.8 USM.


User Rating: 101-08-2008 / Sasha

Colleague! A tezisno can describe the main pluses EF 85mm f/1.2L? Comments about it yesterday in net.Videl magazine.75000 district.
And vygdyadit very appetizing.
Seriously. I understand that this is - portretnik ...
Sam take 24-105 already mestsev 8 and playing in principle with the diaphragm and settings to solve problems with sharpness and background. And what could Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM???


User Rating: 131-07-2008 / Nobody

Give Canon kit 400D complete with a good poltinnikom or Canon 450D kit? C calculation that in future it will have to sell and buy more professional.


User Rating: 129-07-2008 / Nobody

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM - for portraits


User Rating: 129-07-2008 / Alexander

sorry to ask a question again bought eos 400 with lens EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 no pleasure from the fact подскажите images for a portrait and landscape coca better lens


User Rating: 128-07-2008 / Chertjonok

hello! podskazhiete: whether to use flash to the zenith of the old Canon 350d?


User Rating: 128-07-2008 / Chertjonok

hello! podskazhiete: whether to use flash to the zenith of the old Canon 350d?


User Rating: 128-07-2008 / office worker

Give please good fotiku object to this, I want to take photographs of nature and people think poltinnik.Vmeste to take the carcass must meet included 25
And I think over the Nikon D80, it is better to wait for him to gain or take Kenon? Thank you in advance ...


User Rating: 128-07-2008 / lawyer

Nissin 622. Vedas number 43, the price of 5600, virtually no negative feedback. The good compatibility with Canon 350, 400.
Slightly more expensive Sigma 500 - 6200, because the real number 42, working with her more difficult.
All recommends using Canon EX 430? 9300 rub. Advantages-work extremely accurate, simple process of shooting, excellent results. Sam take the old Sigma 500, because with the flash off rare.
Good luck and masterpieces!


User Rating: 126-07-2008 / Alexander

I bought eos-400 with lens with a 18-55 shots but want a better lens is better for portrait and landscape


User Rating: 125-07-2008 / Alex

For 25-07-2008 / Alexander
Do not come. Given the sprinkle-matrix factor, EGF this lens will be around 150-450 mm. Potreta for a bit too much, but for landscape - even more so.


User Rating: 125-07-2008 / Alexander

Otvette Islam does not zatrudnit.Poydet for landscape and portrait if premenit lens for EOS-400 EF100-300


User Rating: 124-07-2008 / lawyer

EmA, matrix at 400 D and 30 D are similar in size but differ in size cells: from 30 D cell (pixel) bigger, so more DD
another signal-processing algorithm, weaker AA-filter before matrix for more detail (sometimes with the conversion of raw while increasing sharpness to 7 in the converter DPP appears moire, shumodavom treated in FSH) For noise-maloshumen in jpeg shumnovat in raw from iso200. BUT: detalirovka and plasticity of the image is that when applying fotoshopovskogo shumodava (very moderate) image quality produced by unattainable for 350 - Tokyo and 400 - ki. Sam have 350 - m, 400 - m, 30 - m. Following the acquisition of 30 - are both ki as spare camera, sometimes taking with them to the Iasi 400 - and, in addition to 30 - kay. The same lenses on another (better) working at 30 - kay. Fotoyacheek size, spacing between them and their location in one with a 5 D matrix only in size 15 x 23 mm, and because the image obtained 30 - to a picture is worth close to 5 D. Mylnost images at 30 - even with no kay whale 18-55.
Equally pictures 30 D and 400 D said that the post-30 shots - Tokyo as well as being 400 - ethicists, or you shooting in jpeg. 30-ka requires more dosed converter application settings and filters in FSH, the image on the screen may seem not quite sharp but when viewing 100% increase immediately visible mikrorezkost high, with good printer for printing pictures of plasticity-sharp and vysokodetalirovannye not look flat. 8 MP 30 - Tokyo


User Rating: 124-07-2008 / lawyer

Landscape, macro-optics rezkorisuyuschaya, smyagchnny-portrait drawing.
In fact needed 2 lens. As a portrait can be used Sigmu 28-200 DG macro (plasticity but not a hard figure) price of about 7500 rubles., Landscapes also personally, I take Sigmoy 10-20 DC EX price 15900 rub.Makroobektivy not using, Sigma 28-200 allows enough withdraw large, with the subsequent processing of FSH.
Sincerely, Lawyer.


User Rating: 123-07-2008 / Igor

Please Give what you want to take the lens 400D for shooting landscapes, macro, portrait shooting? it is desirable that price was not as a wing of the aircraft 8-) _ thanks in advance


User Rating: 121-07-2008 / Sasha

Only the second option.


User Rating: 119-07-2008 / serega

Give please neochen good and expensive for this outbreak fotika!


User Rating: 117-07-2008 / Moysha

In principle, all machines are comparable, but if you choose something between 400 and Dr d80, d80 whale definitely better and work Nikon, I personally prefer. If there is an opportunity to try himself.


User Rating: 117-07-2008 / Serg

Help please with the choice that best of 3 x SLR cameras Digital camera Canon EOS 400D or Nikon D60 or D 80 (kit) and then completely lost already


User Rating: 117-07-2008 / Nobody

(Canon EF-S 18-55) (CANON EF 50 mm f/1.8 II). It is normal?


User Rating: 117-07-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______

For, alas, you do not specify the task, as I asked you. And just so without looking, you can advise someone who zerkalku and in the hands not kept. So:
You take for amateur or professional purposes? Do you have experience shooting in general? Do you know how to work in a photo? Do you need high-speed serial shooting or not? It is fundamentally important for you to work autofocus? On what format you want to print? WHAT DO YOU SPECIFICALLY, SOBIRAETES FOTOGRAFIROVAT? Are you ready to take costly obetivy or limit the whales?
Then look.


User Rating: 116-07-2008 / Samantha

______ALEKSANDR PERVYY_______
so still that specifically recommend?


User Rating: 116-07-2008 / Alexander

Hello everyone. Give can who knows. You can install the 400d lens with zenith? Is there a conversion?


User Rating: 113-07-2008 / Max

Question:
I would like to take zerkalku entry-level kitom.V later dokupat lenses not sobirayus.Kakoy most qualitative \ \ \ "whale \ \ \" of the following brands: Olympus, Canon, Nikon Price has no znacheniya.Zaranee grateful for concrete response to a specific question :-)


User Rating: 112-07-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______

For such surveys will be more important lens, although desirable camera mirror. For the night sky may be needed and lens aperture. The challenge you have highly specialized, you may still need a shooting interval? (not offend). Read the usual portraits, landscapes, architecture and t.d.Snimat better in RAW, and then processed in the photo.


User Rating: 110-07-2008 / Samantha

There have already been asked what fotik better to take the day and night sky, who can then detailed response.


User Rating: 109-07-2008 / tt Stu and Ma rt

All very simple! We need to press 10 times shutter, but sneeze careful liv e vi e w in the 350d will not work if the regime included "video" and G R S, the truth is another way must be using pliers to remove a mirror that Vivekananda obscure matrix


User Rating: 108-07-2008 / Nobody

TELL pozhalutssta how to switch Live view in 350D??

please .........


User Rating: 107-07-2008 / Misha

You are right, d400 for weddings and I have, but if something poserezney withdraw it d80 (the set of glasses available):)


User Rating: 303-07-2008 / EmA

Pacany goni not free, I and D 400 and D 30, on the same picture quality, with the difference in size. The matrices are one field berries. Sony Alpha 100, no camera (yuzal before buying 400 D) The difference 30 - 400 from Tokyo - Tokyo regimes in the shooting and speed serial shooting. First, bought 30 D (do Wedding photos) and when it was necessary to connect the brother (as with jobs that fail) try many, and as a result of 400 D. All 30 flexibility - Tokyo nahren and unnecessary when shooting weddings, knew would have bought 400 D from the outset, the only handle small, but I bought a battery pack and all in azhure now. Nikonov level of 400 e, just smoke, if not already pridiratsya to the quality of photos, la plage AF number of points - a 3 from Kenona -9, and believe me, they are very important, object to Nikonam not all fit (starting with d40, d40H, d60), I about their own or, more precisely fit but no autofocus! Battery unit to these "kids" prisobachish not, and will forever hang little finger. Yes, Whale lens is not a fountain, sad of the fact he and Whale! A whale set to take stands, as well as the difference between the body and whales are not significant, is considered the lens as a gift:) But to move from 350 to 400 D D is not, but for a 5-D, daaa, here you need to strive. 350-ka not very different from the 400 D spending this money.


User Rating: 103-07-2008 / lawyer

Advise Advise commit second-hand canond30. For only photographing the sky-at the time. Who would have suggested, what camera is best suited for shooting day and night soil?


User Rating: 102-07-2008 / Nobody

Tell me what somebody who is better to take fotik shooting day and especially night sky? Maybe this will work? Preferably in categories up to 7 or yew UAH cheaper.


User Rating: 101-07-2008 / Igor

kenon released EOS 1000D!!! analogue 400D, but worth didzhik3 and 7 points of focus. and environment-card.


User Rating: 101-07-2008 / Maksimka

Фотік simply super) 2 мысяці koristuyus and дуже zadovoleniy.prikro що його вже not viroblyayut.uzyav обєктив 50 mm 1.8 pictures super.ale раджу brother said кітовим obektivom.prikladi Photos can podivitis here:
http://photoclub.com.ua/author/13452/


User Rating: 130-06-2008 / Gochman

I want to buy zerkalku, until it was couple of digital mylnits such as Canon 460, 540, 550 Soni W series, but now I want to mirror. Withdraw all going, and would particularly like to night sky. Give this fotik please come to this or other kakieto can see?
And what are these data Canon EF-S 17-85mm F4.0-5.6 IS USM?


User Rating: 029-06-2008 / Makarov

Give! I want to buy the first zerkalku for quality trepied. Which machine is better to choose? Which lenses?


User Rating: 126-06-2008 / Igor

Agree. I just wrote that there conversion. Yes and for the sake of the experiment, it would be interesting to try.


User Rating: 126-06-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______

Maybe something and fits, but many functions, using adapters that are not supported. For example, the work stabilizer. With such a large presence of optics, like CANON, and a NIKON, it is believed that there was no point in adapters. The need for good lens, you can meet native optics in each of these 2 - x systems. But if someone like, please, put adapter.


User Rating: 124-06-2008 / Denis

I do not know that already posovetovat.Eto ultrazumam otnositsya.A to take ultrazumy generally do not have low resolution rekomenduetsya.U reduced sharpness larger weight and tsena.K tomuzhe ultrazum without stab-vessch useless, I really negovoryu about their very low intensity. In short, more than 300 mm is money to the wind.
BUT IF YOU DO NOT OSTANAVLIVAET I can recommend the current Cenon 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM. Ponimaesh Just as it has not pofotkaesh landscapes and how portretnik neochen.Da zoom and then no more than 4.5 But that is all that I can recommend!
I mogby help you better eslib you can say for what purpose you need to object and what money you raspologaete.Mozhet you need Medium or dlinnofokusny telezum.A may need ultrozum with an initial broad uglom.Potomu will wait for additional information from you.
Denis.


User Rating: 123-06-2008 / Alexander (North)

GEORGES,

Letters to zoom 0.7 ... that is, you can see through videoiskatel 70% image .. it only reduces the (pro I kitovsky standard lens)


User Rating: 122-06-2008 / vitaly

What optics to recommend him for 300-400 bucks?


User Rating: 119-06-2008 / Nobody

Today vparil 400D kit 18-55 for $ 600 now will take 40 e but I doubt tormented че better 30d or 40d. Che compression for Kirov at 40? Nah, they think of it, if чесно hardship to Z0 yuzal who actually write 40 or 30! !!))))


User Rating: 119-06-2008 / Nobody

No it there. Fix 50 mm.


User Rating: 118-06-2008 / Georges

Something I did not find information about the zoom lens on the whale ... He is there at all?


User Rating: 118-06-2008 / Denis

Personally for Victoria to inform you if you have nothing more Activities that take such FEU.Pomomu not bad replace CCD matritsu.Konechno тож astronomers now moving to the CCD matrix but FEU pomoymu cheaper cost.
ASTRONOMY Why? Because only the equipment they use for shooting in different wavelengths ranging from low to high UV IR izlucheniya.Mozhet you certainly prevented oshibku.Potomu that if all that you wrote on full seriously, and I simply nonsense kakayato reluctant to answer. Camera for smki photos and therefore he is working within the visible radiation and therefore maximum sensitivity matrix will be within the 'Vidimoy zone "ie just between UV and infrared camera to film izlucheniyami.Pytatsya something other than" Apparent "spectrum-such idiocy that even nehochetsya comment!
Dan.


User Rating: 118-06-2008 / Denis

Generally I agree with that, too, because Nobody nefiga not ponyal.Cho for "Aura". Can "Areol" or lateral expose neponimayu.Esli ... I remember correctly basis - the infrared radiation the human eye is invisible but very CCD matrix even sees . Therefore, if used infrared filtry.Hotya all in teorii.Lichno I have not used such filters made in neobhodimosti.Teoreticheski infrared filters needed in shooting at sea скажем.Но povtryu DONT be made as long as necessary in its application.
Yes you forgot (Nobody) to thank for their assistance in selecting the analogue kenonovskogo obektiva.Bolshoe thanks.
At the same time express great appreciation for the help Alex.
Dan.

13-06-2008 / Oksana
Tell me please, and whose assembly, it should be?


User Rating: 112-06-2008 / Nobody

For Victoria. Something you naputali. In what is hertz? What you want to measure the frequency? I think you want to know the range of wavelengths which registers the camera? manufacturers are unlikely to give such information. There are, however, several cameras have a feature photographs of infrared range. Very beautiful landscapes are obtained. :)


User Rating: 112-06-2008 / Ivan

Uvozhaemye, подскажите please buy a lens to that device .. We need to zoom was great (etwa 10 - x) well, and that price was not much kusuchaya. Thank you in advance.


User Rating: 111-06-2008 /. J

че write robbery and was horrified ... I have 400 D. satisfied. although what difference lovers .. 450D did not take, even though the live-vyu and many other pleasant plyusikov smallest (and minusikov). minuses at 400 D - bird cut shirt for pens, and can not get used. but in general is not particularly zamorachivatsya - 350 - 400 - 450 privyknite to any of the cells. as someone above rightly - better buy good glasses. duct ozhdidal worst. at ISO1600 neponimayuschie not understand anything, but if not then pridiratsya and 400 prokanaet. although not fundamentally zadirayu above 100. Pravda [censored] fix 50 mm and then see what is really noise. good machine, I am very satisfied. All nitpicking irrelevant, kaemra it is not super expensive!

but I wanted to say more. stab at the lens, not only for long excerpts. ; OR


User Rating: 310-06-2008 / Victoria

There I have a question for specialists. This is very important for one case, which I provernut intentions. For so-called "aura photos." You do not tell what the lower and upper thresholds of sensitivity with this camera and have it like EOS 350D in Hz? I am referring to an open area of the electromagnetic spectrum. In the technical characteristics of such data, no camera. Thanks in advance.


User Rating: 010-06-2008 / Nick

Everything. Canon 400D withdrawn from production.


User Rating: 110-06-2008 / Nobody

And what next? 40 lines per mm enough to print a very sharp snapshot of 40 x 40 cm


User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Vlad

See description !!!?..." maximum resolution - no data? "Everything is simple:" 3888/22, 2 = 175 (line / mm) or
175 * 25 = 4375 dpi, next, "no data"-derives from the previous. Incidentally !..., a obektivchik think the resolution is not more than 40 lines / mm and then at the center.
You can continue to count, especially on CHKH or FPM. This is for PROFI ...
All Hi ...


User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Alex

They all CCD and CMOS and CCD. Unfortunately simple articles about the differences and CMOS SS D, I, too, does not. The main difference in principle with the reader signal matrix - a CCD, he read only as a whole, with the whole matrix completely, consistently, line for line, a type of expenditure in the elbow assault rifle cartridges. A CMOS signal can withdraw from any pixel or group, regardless of its location on the matrix and you can take the whole matrix at the same time. In this way increases the speed serial shooting (much higher than that of the SS D). CMOS really noisy CCD, but much more economical in production and consumes significantly less energy for the work. Therefore, and put in their profiles. High-quality photo on CMOS achieved through large parts svetopriemnoy pixel. This is related to the design matrices - in profile facing polnokadrovye matrix (70% svetopriemnoy part of the total area of the matrix), while compact, and ultrazumah prosyumerah buffering uses a matrix of columns (only 30% of the total area svetoprimenikov matrix). I have an article on the general principles of the matrix, if you will - will give a reference.


User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Vasil

Alex
2.
I want to write you a fresh memory eyes I remembered.
The human eye distinguishes color where it two hundred times more than the camera.
If you look in the mirror, you often see one when viewing a snapshot get a little bit different in the sense of color.
Mylnitsa that shows on the monitor accurately and gives it in the frame and I do not removing frame can fix all that I do not like.
I was filmed in glasses and just do not see some sharp navozhu shot, sharpness at the center, accounting for color match on beds with flowers and almost always trust Kalashnikov
If the center does not promazal sharpness highest class.
At 5 Mega working as a sniper using a point not breathe reliance tripod is not always postavish.
If something super put the timer.
Wee below wrote in the transition from film to figure who is what it requires.
I Conversely, I like to light peoples' purchasing this machine.
I do not get from home without it more than three years is my friend (some Chinese sales broken once cut plume) thou bi get Yapontsa 5100 or 5000, I would have taken today.
A company CANON NIKON and they work simultaneously and long.
In the Internet I read this statement NIKON takes half the profits only for your name!
But his need to win this does not write in the newspaper saying it is working well, I give blood and sweat and dozens of years.


User Rating: 309-06-2008 / Monseigneur

Since bat.blokom perfect body. His money is .. Nikon number not valyalsya (40h, 60 - for this class competitors kenonu 400450) ... 450d definitely a better d80 of nikona .. About 40 e silently .. believe the same d300, currents on the 1000 USD cheaper:) Nikony - tool losers, kenon - successful photographers ... :) Axiom IMHO


User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Alex

In fact, attempts to abandon the mirrors have already been made. It was a pair of cameras from Olympus (do not remember exactly, like E-20), where instead of mirrors stood separation prism. She razdeleyala luminous flux for the matrix and the viewfinder. But the negative side (dark viewfinder, mistakes exposure meter) okzalos enough to have refused from the system.


User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Denis

Zerkalki also add that much more difficult and expensive maintenance heavier kompaktok (which incidentally have already indicated Alex) and this is not all shortcomings Zerkalok.NO.Odno large "NO". All these shortcomings overlap preimushestvami! Of course provided that this person zerkalkoy able to use (which incidentally also already mentioned).
I already wrote-FOTOGRAF-gold alloy chamber and cheloveka.Dazhe fan who enjoys zerkalkoi (also desirable for those who use compact) simply need to know principle and structure of its fotoapparata.Neobhodimo not only know the principle of the CCD sensor to know the strengths and weaknesses CMOS and SSD matrits.Neobhodimo know very, very differently mnogoe.A zerkalka in the hands of the same and that MARTYSHKA OCHKI!
Very respectfully hope ponimanie.S Den


User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Denis

Alex, I FULLY agree with you that what you write about zerkalku!
At the expense of protecting the mirror-and the truth it can only mirror now in zerkalke functionally neobhodimo.Pisat budu.Och why not a lot of text and who DONT and do not understand.
Just write about the size of the matrix (I mean physical size) is not there for budu.Chto nonsense about matrix kompaktok Nobody wrote komentariev.Dostoinstvo zerkalok also without Real-lock (and not as a virtual kompaktok), vydnrzhka, Fizich size of the matrix and the fact that the matrix of cabinet (and not as in compact bezkorpusnye), Semnye lenses (truth-dust perennial problem but have to pay for quality and design over time it will solve) ... In short perecheslyat ustanesh.Da and add from the fact that the matrix zerkalke include in the current at the time of shooting power zerkalok - In RAZY LESS than the kompaktok.


User Rating: 108-06-2008 / Drug

Of course, yes for the quality of assembly, and ergonomics, it is not very small enough, the lens televik tseplyaesh vasche unrealistic, and the picture he did, but it nikon vasche lohovskoy divorce, as a company, which makes for taiwan: - D d80 about it, plus it convenient enough, and more without words, people just get on with it lave.Pentaks 10 e nikona on its head above, I have not talking about 30.40 d.A "profffi" 200300d:-D ... Vobsche withdraw all in red. The only hope nikona d3. Че nenado So all of you to write the type of [censored] s one I Dartanyan


User Rating: 108-06-2008 / KLenK !!!!!!!!

Polkupat such Nadia is meaningless ........ For many reasons description below ........ Hotyaby because it is the cheapest with a preliminary class, and therefore most expensive class with soap will not inferior in quality and in printsepe and better if search for and compare nemochny Whale object to kenone d400 ..... want quality mirrors then buy from nikona d80 and above ..... Protects етот Nadia those who "lohonulsya" with his choice and is "schaslivym" holder. printsype in the majority of those who object oriented етот not have pridstavleniya on trebuvaniyam k5achestva zerkalok because ...........


User Rating: 108-06-2008 / Alex

Semi? Yes do? But light is still reflected.
Do me and "mylnichka" for 500 bucks and a mirror for 1700. I can not try "to edify on the path of truth" and Tupi is not going to argue. You can not explore anything. Simply understanding of the principles of the technology allows you to use it more effectively. Too many lovers, moving from film to figure beginning to demand a lot from it. Although a small body of a zoom lens with a decent range FR, and that without distortion, and that at this lens and potrtet and macro and landscape could be removed, and day and night shots класные receive. And while forgetting that the laws of physics, no one has been cancelled. That raises questions why the matrix 1 / 2, 5 does not give such as the DD format APS-C or FF, or why the premises are not getting shots, and why zerkalki always take off faster than CDs. I agree that mirror delivers a number of inconveniences, but the positive side of their overlap.


User Rating: 107-06-2008 / Alex

Well-to, if it was so and, as you write, something of a mirror long ago would have refused. But the mirror until needed. First, it somehow protects the matrix from external influences during the change of optics. Secondly, constantly exhibit matrix, as in ultrazumah or compact, very bad. Because it leads to its heating, and thus create noise. For example, the temperature increase by 9 degrees matrix increases the noise doubled. The third, larger matrix expensive. For example, you accidentally brought the camera in the sun, and your matrix does not vyderazhala such a test. A mirror will not burn her.
The list goes on, but this is enough. And in the end, with the focus on pentaprism viewfinder is much easier, because the permission of your eyes are much higher than that of ext. psevdozerkalki viewfinder screen. Learn what the CCD, how it works and that affects the quality of its work. And many of the issues no longer exist by themselves.


User Rating: 107-06-2008 / Nobody

Hi all pros and qmail!
Read "Replacement" "FED 2" "Zeint ET" "Kiev 19" glue curtains in the "zenith" glides in and regulate "kieve19".
A kettle подскажите me why modern digital cameras mirror, I never can understand?
In optical electronic environment chat mirror discourage atom as tennis rackets, balls in the matrix perekrivaet direct access to it does not give a direct focus on єкран while you're shooting in the dark, and if a series of images I salute the quality of such Verkhovna but need to change this outdated system, we will return to the sharpness of photos which leads to matte glass screen and now replaces his sootvtstveno both simpler and more reliable?.
If your lens CANONa 400D no IS USM and then filmed at the same FED 2.
I understand in "Zenita ET" and "Kiev 19" in the mirror to meet at least not remove the covers of the lens.
Take for example the camera "mylnitsy" as you say, they are on their technology is far ahead of zerkalok gone!
It is recognized all over time.
Just these machines poor quality of construction.
But the technology is very high class.
I see the bad and glasses off in the automation of the central point and hope for the machine (at random) 18000 images yet made a major gaps be made during this time our "Kiev19" 4 would sdohli
Compared with the same class kenonami shots better at 30 percent.
A prostavte them on konveer as zerkalki qualitatively and make them forget about zerkalkah a year as a film.
The screen is the same mirror. N


User Rating: 306-06-2008 / Vitali

Good times of the day, I have a question - just the other day took 400D, particularly his yuzal have not yet, but lifting the lens found a protective glass sensor visible atom. How do no harm to remove them? Ask because of - an entry-level user. Can this fulfil brush (included in pencil for cleaning lenses)? I would be very grateful for the professional recommendations.


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody

For Marseilles.
In the three wooden pieces can be purchased only b.u. The best for you, I think would be a thread ultrazum. This is a great choice. The same Canon S2, olimpusy series Camedia, Sony early series N or Panas series FZ. But do not Minoltu. Their metering - that's not susceptible to common sense, and clear lenses are no different. Tsifrovik to fix - you can hardly find such. Personally, I have not seen such Sales (I do not mean to fix zerkalok). But that lenses with a fixed FR paint a better picture than zoom, so this is true, although with the caveat - it's necessary to look at the manufacturer and specifically on the model. The existence of stab - preferably, but not necessarily.


User Rating: 306-06-2008 / Vlad

I am sincerely sorry people who think that tsyfromylnitsa or ultrazum zerkalki better. Remember, even with the whales zerkalka GORAZDO better than any ultrazum fakt.Esli is no money to buy expensive optics, and you will not need high-quality cameras how. Tsyfromylnitsy and ultrazumy this type cameras "Navedi and zhmi" have been developed for ordinary people who can not and will not work with high-quality equipment to satisfy their primitive appetite. If Vi hotote not be primitive (prostachkovym) user, you should kachestvennnoy technology users.


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Mak

Well, there Oliimpus bought 520. Photos class! 30 per cent of all marriages. But I understood that the quality of Canon 400D above. Practise godik and [censored] Canon with an expensive lens, and then Olimpusa the fore fokusiruesh rear loses a little sharpness. Right at the forum were those who wrote that any better at zerkalka machine than for example, Canon S5 IS for manual installation. Thank you kindly to David and nervous Nobody!


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody

Sigma AF 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC (professor)


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody

Tamron SP AF 20-40 mm F/2.7-3.5 (professor)
Tamron AF 17-50 F/2.8 XR DI LD


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Alex

On the lens - not say, I do not know, frankly. Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM - just this, though not quite what they need. But you probably himself know about it. We have to look at other manufacturers.


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Alex

Well, if desired, it can stabilize and do shut down. On the advantages of systems say that in my opinion shift matrix is more efficient than moving lens - rely on experience and so, and with others. Of course, if light enough, then stab better shut down, because any moving parts has inertia. But, here today, for example, I had to withdraw on extracts close to 1 / 20. So stab me in handy. Everything depends on the specific conditions of shooting.


User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Denis

Again согласен.Но I stab in optics has several priimuschestv.Hotya what difference will be that Engine Group corrective lenses or CCD matritsa.Prosto pomoemu girodatchiki for more precise optics chtoli.Hotya all these words in reality I have not used a camera with a built-optical stabilization . Znaesh Alex some such write that on the contrary a little stab razmazyvaet картинку.Не знаю.До still stab me from optical implemented only good for Canon vospominaniya.Da incidentally neznaesh and whether there is an analogue EF 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM tlko among Class L . Nenashol and I do that then. 24-105 not help it.


User Rating: 105-06-2008 / borodatij

please help choose a lens for shooting nature and home ....


User Rating: 105-06-2008 / Alex

Here are poor)))) Dear Nobody! In the body SLR cameras Canon 400D stabilizer not. For the simple reason that Canon sells mobile lens stabilization through the lens. Therefore, they put directly into the lens. If you are so important to stabilize, then you'll have to buy a lens with the stabilizer. Or look to the side of Pentax. For example Pentax K20D. They stab implemented on a shift in the matrix and ustanavlyavayutsya cameras themselves. Sam stabilizer is not the quality of the photo does not have any influence. It allows you to withdraw longer extracts (you can increase by 2-3 foot). So, compliance, reduces the risk smazany get shot when shooting with hands, compensating for camera shake.

05-06-2008 / Denis
Although zerkalki and more natural size of the matrix and therefore clarity above and below the noise to have a negative storona.K and large-sized matrix trebuetsa big obektivy.SRAVNIVAY SAM!
I had the S3-IS whose object roughly the equivalent of 20-430 mm, with lights f/2.8 at the brief trube.U kitovskogo same lenses EOS400D equivalent to 18-55 mm in svetochuvstvit at the brief trumpet f/3.5-5.6 So much for your denetsya priimuschestvo zerkalki in svetochuvstvit matrix (at 400D ISO-800 at high noise visible) before svetochuvstvit kompakta.A where ultrazum denetsya.Ya do not say that there is S5 optical stabilizer on a whale of 400D net.I certainly S5 USM to drive a Focus on the whale to 400D net.I add that to withdraw a whale lenses to zerkalki (at least 400D) - zerkalku vykinut.A easier with decent object to stab zerkalki cheaper than 27000-30000 rublikov you do not naydesh.I IN WHEN YOU SKOKA ZERKALKA OBOYDETSYA Camera case and even if they add?
Sincerely Denis.


User Rating: 104-06-2008 / Denis

Dear Mak.Ya forced to agree to the entire Nobody. Although he rezok.Vo too early to start - Photographer gold alloy this man and his camera fotoapparata.Snimaet not a person through fotoapparata.Ya would like to say that if you zadaesh question "steeper Is the CD zerkalki "then you have to take zerkalku rano.esli dumaesh that you buy poluprofessionalku level EOS40D or fotik with full-matrix immediately stanesh Prof. shots-do you strongly oshibaeshsya.U zerkalki and compact except that they both use electronic CCD sensor (battery-charging device with a backward linkage) is not anything to do! Ponimaesh ZERKALKA-far more complex than say kopakt device and use it extremely difficult! Ponimaesh a compact with the image sensor constantly comes in the viewfinder and on the same displey.U zerkalki opposite you all through optical vidish system and a group zerkal.I only at the time of shooting oprakidyvaetsya mirror and cast light on matritsu.Uzhe in this extraordinary complexity zerkalke.Esli shooting at you through half the CD pressing Morocco descent vootchiyu uvidish desplee dark on whether or not to be such that you fotografiya.Ved vidish the same as that sees and sees such matritsa.I before making frame uvidish histogram on whether to add or turnover ubavit чувствительность.То zerkalke need to pre-establish the sensitivity and then looking to extract additional nastroykah.V think about what eventually uvidish you receive a current photo after the second though semki.Vo


User Rating: 004-06-2008 / Nobody

without stabilizer photos will be much worse? ! someone help me or not! I have a week to search for a good fotik! help please!


User Rating: 104-06-2008 / Mak

Well, how would you explain. I bought a Canon S5 IS. Car just super! And zoom 12, and turning the video display and withdraw what I have not seen on video cameras, but the pictures are not very, some razmazannye. Well, I do not born to be surgeon! CAUSES. Of course you want to be able to withdraw, but there is another side of this coin. ISO above 200 will not even such a kettle as I have seen noises, a short excerpt is not done, fotik begins to shout that the shot will be dark, even with the best coverage. I think that with me zerkalkoy be even easier. Although the percentage of marriages would be lower.


User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Nobody

What is better than the figures? This digital camera, rather than film! A clear and sharp picture with good weather can be obtained from any camera ...


User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Mak

Not quite so. I understand that if I take Zerkalnuyu camera and cellphone at the brief excerpt object, the picture with good weather will be clear and quite sharp. In any case better than the numbers.


User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Nobody

Yes what a difference that you buy? Olympus, kenon, nikon ... They still do not remove themselves well! Buy at least something and enjoy shooting, and then you just go and look at them .. Meaning?


User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Mak

Thank you, Dennis! My misery continued at the choice fotika the seventh consecutive day. Today, I suggested Olympus S 410 SE KIT. It stands to stab lens can be removed through the monitor, as well as test shots almost from the D400. Over 300 euros think you can take to taste, but the D450 for 700 too many. about may have any other options?


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis

Dear Mak. Generally speaking honestly if something stab piece poleznaya.Prilichny stab withdraw allows for large vyderzhkah.A chrevychayno is useful in the conduct of shooting in low light conditions or when large glubene sharpness.
Stabia may be different-Optical stab, Electronic and combi stab.Elektronny stab-stab fuflo as enjoyed by internal resources as well as fotika fotki.V result quality pictures strongly uhudschaetsya.Optich stab thing-but he raspalagaetsya exclusively in the optical system is обьектива.То has fotik stab or not all ravno.Naoborot-camera stabilizer without much luchshe.Optich stabilizer is indicated in the brand IS lenses but object to stab optical and often more expensive tyazhelee.Yarky example ultrozumovy CD series from Canon Sx-IS (I personally S3 - IS). So-finding zerkalki EOS 400D 450D eplohie amateur zerkalki.A stab if needed (you and he is very confident and very useful), then take a acc stab.Da and note that the object of kitovsky 400D without a stab in kitovsky 450D vstroen.I stab another supplement that zerkalku going to need some material resursy.Prilichnye transfokalnye lenses even more so with stab stand in most cases very expensive fotoapparata.I last council NEVER BERI TELE ZUM lenses without a stab-pomoymu is a waste of time. Because all the same to the tube with a maximum of hands produced a continuous soap.


User Rating: 202-06-2008 / Kolos

Recently acquired D400. A choice to take Nikon or Canon. Advised me vzyat450. But it was not available. Now I want to buy a good lens for shooting portraits. Encourage what is good. Thank you in advance.


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / ziko

подскажите me as lovers! This photo will be much better than conventional compact fotik?


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Mak

Gentlemen, I almost novichek. I wish 400D, but I am afraid because it without stbilizatora. So whether it is scared?


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / lawyer

Re David.

Universal lenses does not exist. There lenses for the range of tasks. The most versatile for typical works of amateur FR lens with a range of 17 to 200 mm. Of the existing market-optimum Kanon 17-85f 4-5.6 (equivalent to sprinkle 27.2 mm-136 mm.
For specials. tasks (effective landscapes, rakursnaya survey) optimum Sigma 10-20 f 4.5-5.6 (pribl.14000 rub) ,12-24 f 4-5.6 (pribl.17000 river, suitable for 24 h36). In selecting the zoom apply the rule "more multiplicity-less quality."
Best regards


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Igor

Sorry if offended. Buy lens for a particular purpose, rather than simply looking at price. And for those who have not decided that I want to say that you can buy the lens and for 2-3 thousand cu, but it does not guarantee you a good picture. All good luck!


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis

Eyes are afraid hands delayut.Tak pomoymu govoritsya.Esli who worked with Canon let even with the relatively easy komkaktami privyknet and their zerkalke.Tak смело.Ну or take that first before buying in the hands oprobuy.Uveren ponravitsya.A to the test photos.
I watched a photo devchenki what to.Snyato class but simply that such a quality order from the whale lenses ... Neznayu if that is possible when ideal conditions, and only for pros.


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis

Well, for bayonet can not face it so raschitan.U I also faces EF 70-200mm f / 4 L IS USM. Neudobno course согласен.Но pay for the quality nado.V any case can warm themselves thought that EF 70-200mm f / 2.8 L IS USM - more than twice tyazhelee.A EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS albeit slightly easier but in quality and harrakteristikam him before EF 70-200mm f / 4 L IS-far


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis

And even mention that if you saw this zloschastnuyu letter S in the EF-S is a risk and take notice EF-S-bayonet specials under sprinkle-matritsu.Esli want to do something to make comments on them please suschestvu.A it if you do not like I have proposed a set of lenses, to explain why you think my selection of a wrong and even then svoi.A of these lenses will be easier for humans choose the one that he nuzhen.A prediratsya if you want it to the entire glupo.Tak as okanchatelno confuse those whom we trying to help in the selection.
Sincerely Denis.


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis

I thank Igor zamechanie.Spravedlivosti for the sake EOS450D note that I really do not in the hands держал.То that stab in kitovskom glass to him have tested знал.Но kitovskoe glass of EOS400D hesitate to recommend kitovskoe and glass from the 450D. I can recommend only what comes in the hands and then I have no complaints вызвало.Не can certainly say that I am an experienced amateur and much more, I do not профи.Но on my face EOS400D lenses EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM and EF 70-200mm f / 4 L IS USM. These lenses course тож недостатки.Но their lenses at what they do not exist. So I recommended these lenses because I enjoyed them and for all time, serious narikany them nebylo.Oba these lenses kitovskogo much better (at least from exactly 400D) If you think that distinguished Igor above lenses marked me wrong choice then of their . But in any case, even if I am wrong and you do not have the right to offend me and to stand as an idiot who necherta not knowing in photographs and even in the hands nederzha fotika neither glass nor has the courage and audacity of whom either rekomendovat.Ochen hope for your understanding. I repeated that at the expense kitovskogo lenses to 450D and the sky, I might as rights to use these lenses, I do not have to even deeper to my сожалению.Но I reinsurance.


User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis

And I said that unless the letter S in the brand-lenses means любительская.Ну now tell me where you lenses in the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM-saw the letter S. Read need closer look. IS-stab. DO-lens of glass with low dispersion pomoymu. USM-engine focus and so dalee.Esli closer look you notice that read something I wrote a series of S-любительская.Но unless I wrote in the letter that the brand lenses mean amateur


User Rating: 101-06-2008 / dani

подскажите a Canon EOS 400D, kit includes optics or not? if so, it is good or not? me as lovers and whether to borrow or rent a camera for $ 200-300 a small conventional digital photo camera? big difference? otvette pliiiiizzz !!!!!!


User Rating: 101-06-2008 / D e n

Blin all kicked whale although initially normal glass, 3 months otfotkal them understand that you need more, but about good lenses, are all good with markirovochkoy L personally, I bought a 70-200L and understood that e 400 is not suitable to it, ie picture but cool Convenience enough kills derzhesh trimya his fingers, even with a heavy focus glass hand to put the problem clearly, and I still wave over the bayonet ..... vobschem [censored] and I take the good old 30 village ....


User Rating: 101-06-2008 / and

You ponapisyvali such that the head does not nalazit! :) What is then the "S" - series, as you called it, amateur? The letter "S" in the title is not said that the amateur lens. Do not tell! Rzhunemogu .....


User Rating: 101-06-2008 / Igor

Is not! new 18-55 IS precisely with the stabilizer. The lens is very good and very sharp! Do not believe people who camera and then never in the hands not kept. If you take 450 D, the courage to buy whale 18-55 IS, not regret.


User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Denis

Please excuse that вмешиваюсь.Но listen soveta.Beri imagine 400 or 450D from scratch but they do not takiezh and expensive and eyes and lenses from the eyes snachala.Kameru think you can imagine and smenish and lenses ostanutsya.Ochen not advise on the whale or the other brat.POZhALEESh.Svetosila horror-not as weak stab and no permission sludge not to mention the problems with fokusirovkoy.Esche again ask before buying the eyes and lenses podumat.Kachestvo pictures in the eyes of lenses depends mainly because fotike current matrix.


User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Denis

Privetstvuyu.Kak you understand bavaet not one but a steep obektiva.Zaranee govoryu.Kitovsky object-shit complete and suitable as a current Diverters fotiku.
Lenses are divided into Makroobektiva-(makrosemka), Panoramniki (Shiroekougolniki)-panorama fotkat.Standartnye (Portretnik)-Rights fotkat, Tele-object for shooting wildlife.
The same lenses are divided into two classes at a price-(U Canon is "S" - or series of amateur and "L" - a series or professional). I recommend a professional because although they are expensive but water and dust protected shell and excellent quality stekla.Esli you want fotkat nature of people and I would suggest you following obektivy.Dlya EOS400D This EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L IS USM (Prof object of kenon) and EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM (amateur Objects as a series of analogies from Prof. personally I do not nashol). I do not know your experience with obrasheniya zerkalkami father and apologize for the upper truth.
If you have questions write to me at all mylo.Otvechu interface you questions because to me difficult to mention all the nuances here.


User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Mak

Three days sitting looked at the pictures in the test http://wwwnew.dpreview.com/gallery/, I believe that the best from the 400D. The most natural colors, realistic scenes. Better than Nicon D40 and others. And, interestingly, this survey was conducted, "Kitovym" lens or with another, more classroom? And it would be dishonest. I am a fan, I would like very canon 400D, but I fear it will be very inconvenient to use.


User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Konstantin

All greetings! People, help is now looking at pictures of competence in the properties of data about the photographs. There is a parameter: rareshenie horizontal and vertical resolution (measured in pixels per inch), and so, from photographs made with digital cameras with a large number megapiseley is horizontal and vertical resolution of less than images made with fewer cameras megapixel camera. As is understood and what it says??


User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Nobody

I have both the camera. finding one - if
zarabatvaete not at this money - it anyway. and if so - that kenon.
olimpusa pluses - weight, size, color, GEAR, two different whale in the set. compared with kenona whales - just super.
kenona - a range that noise.
in conditions of poor illumination, concerts, etc. -- Kenon better.
By the day, or up to 8-10 meters evening - olik. good color and sharpness.


User Rating: 130-05-2008 / Shimano

Gentlemen!
Who still tell what Ribel XTI?
It seems like I heard that's associated with battery charging,
amerikosskaya type and we hrenovo works for a different voltage network ...
Mr. and vayt boxing sho this?, теж tsikavo:)
Thank you all!


User Rating: 129-05-2008 / Vitos

yuzal who, how many missing acclamation?


User Rating: 228-05-2008 / REBEL

Three weeks, as has a 400D. It is quite satisfied. Took over in Samara 21630. Kit, complete termosublimatsionny printer and consumable materials. This is my first zerkalka. Very satisfied. Spent already a couple of commercial orders.


User Rating: 328-05-2008 / Santiaga

All greetings, already seen in this forum to discuss and compare Olympus E-510 and Canon 400D, but vsezhe still want to clarify. Maybe someone from there is the experience of working with Olympus and Canon together. What did better? At Olympus there are any type GEAR stabolizatora, LivePreview, etc., which have no Canon, whether they are qualitative, especially stabilizer, and that even better. On the choice of optics for Olympus or Canon in my town no problems. Thanks in advance!


User Rating: 128-05-2008 / Katuwwka

and not tell that who has this Verkhovna: function WITHOUT OUTBREAKS it good? quality photographs? if for example in the room or in the job in the place where would mylnitse avtovspyshka involved?


User Rating: 128-05-2008 / Vitos

but as a matrix to the CCD or CMOS?
write all that noisy CMOS


User Rating: 127-05-2008 / Nobody

White Box - camera, which was discovered marriage, they are refined at the plant and running again for sale. All this legally. In fact, many professionals advise them to take it - Canon well eliminates defects, but on the new "normal" marriage can still find ... Of course, guarantee that something difficult, but such opinion exists:)


User Rating: 127-05-2008 / Leyla

Nobody, подскажите pliz, I understand that White box-this apparatus, which has some minor flaws? But in principle it working? and that means Rebel Xti almost everywhere it is? I see that the carcass is easier to buy and so far that one but a good lens than whale 18-55. spba


User Rating: 127-05-2008 / A1

At the normal price 400D in Kiev has already dismantled - in warehouses No, now wait 450:)


User Rating: 126-05-2008 / Nobody

55-250 and 28-200 is not bad
but they are few and everything depends on the category tseovoy


User Rating: 125-05-2008 / Leyla

Spoken at once - I - not proffi.
People, подскажите pliz, I want to take the 400 "carcass" and a pair of lenses. One 50, I understand there to shoot close, and the second at the distance (or better vasche whale, and if the whale what, there are also looking at different tricks.) In stores did not suggest any rules mogut.Itog: better whale or bird cut "and if Whale what. Thank you.

25-05-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Bone.
If you buy exactly 400 D, then it goes without lens stabilization. It is quite cheap, so you decide: you want it or not. If you do not make special requirements for the photos, he may well you treble.
By 450 D is somewhat improved optically EF-S 18-55 ... IS, which, moreover, is stabilized.


User Rating: 124-05-2008 / Bone

say he is good and the whale lens or all buy and immediately change obektiv.iz of what such a hype.


User Rating: 123-05-2008 / Vica

I bought a week ago with a whale lens. Very happy image, and let all swearing at the whale, but I like a man who keeps in the hands of his first camera, all satisfied. Surprise that focuses in complete darkness in the street. While at the machine off, but gradually open up for themselves all the new features. Words: nothing very satisfied with their choices))


User Rating: 123-05-2008 / Nobody

For PTlens distortion is a plug-in ImageMaster from Richard Rosenman Lens distorion corrector (or pro for denyuzhki)
but in this apparatus of distortion and no more than 0.3 is very cool! 1


User Rating: 123-05-2008 / Yury

Alexandre.
Pomoemu, distortion in ImageMaster can not be eliminated, although the term can be corrected. Maybe Transform-> Warp in the eighth and ninth version not? Distortion and the prospect of concepts are not clear. Popravte if I am wrong.


User Rating: 323-05-2008 / Victor

400D body digital-only fotik without a lens in komlekte, 400D kit-lens kit with 18-55 mm (highly recommend to take the set, precisely because the wide angle you need, but from 28 mm to 400 -... - not kay suitable as a wide, in close space without 18 -... not do, options 18-200 mm may be even worse). Generally Whale 18-55 mm is not bad (for the best technical quality of images will have to pay USD 350 and counting), he By udelyvaet any, even expensive mylnitsu:), the Council also take 50 mm1.8 (80ue)-for portraits and shooting in polumrake:) But beyond themselves understand that you need!
Read the photographer, not machines, if the 400 e Chn not succeed, then SURE, and the marks do not get:) Monitor light, color, background, perspective, plot and everything can be!


User Rating: 123-05-2008 / vitaly

40 no worse than 30, just unnecessarily expensive:)


User Rating: 122-05-2008 / D e n

Bribery today 70-200 L usm, tyazhelenky feel that vyrvet bayonet, of course differences in quality and the camera lens can be seen immediately, and all will now класно gyroscope three 400kit for $ 600 extra cost and have yet to take 30D Sales Sato 40 pomoemu will be worse


User Rating: 122-05-2008 / sashanek

I EFS 18-55mm not say that they are, quite cool and pictures without a tripod.


User Rating: 122-05-2008 / kirill

_____ for ALEXANDER PERVOGO______
Thank you for the answer probably still dwell on sony a300


User Rating: 122-05-2008 / David

Dear Lawyer.
I-"teapot" which likes to take photographs (400D)
and does not like to change lenses Could you recommend a universal lens for an amateur, not necessarily Canon


User Rating: 122-05-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______

For Cyril and amateur.
In particular model when photographing picture does not appear on the display. " The name of this feature LIVE VIEW and is present in a limited form in CANON 40D and in full in the new model CANON 450D.
CANON NINON Optics and inconsistent because of bayoneta and not suited to each other.


User Rating: 121-05-2008 / amateur

Connoisseurs, подскажите whether to Canon 400D optics from Nikon, apologize if an idiotic question.


User Rating: 120-05-2008 / Nobody

Pravda, the same apparatus mirror!


User Rating: 120-05-2008 / kirill

подскажите Was it that when photographing picture does not appear on the display


User Rating: 120-05-2008 / kirill

First thought to commit themselves sonku N9 but dissuading friend and said take zerkalku
now faces the choice following modelik NADEYUS FOR YOUR HELP
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200, Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 or the Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 350D who can tell about these modelki that it is better


User Rating: 120-05-2008 / Nobody

What is the difference in the canon ... digital camera and canon .... kit
and as you vobsche 2 camera 350 and 400 better than what is the difference


User Rating: 119-05-2008 / Zmey

подскажите please different than canon eos 400D digital and canon eos 400D kit is better?


User Rating: 218-05-2008 / Mikhail

Dima, thank settings for sharpness of images, photos markedly improved on my 400 D.


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / ___ ALEXANDER PERVYY___

For Sashi.
Programs are needed for the conversion of RAW-files in TIFF or JPEG, for correcting the white balance for color, to change the exposure to (RAW-Files) saturation, and much more.


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Sasha

Colleagues! What do programs that are attached to the camera?


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Dima

to "Michael"
Menu button - 2 menu - "style image" (which бі make edits - click "jump") - Tien slider sharpness almost to the maximum (photos turn out less blurry). Remember when photographing select user preferences - button set
Either way № 2 - buy a new lens:)))


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / miha

greetings to all, please help'd like to choose either fotik kenon G9 or zerkalku 400D. want to learn from the G9 is a priority and aperture priority excerpts and what he viewfinder .... please help ....


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Gelios

Video output for viewing on TV


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / D e n

All greetings 4 months ago i bought 400 tons to all legally not fawn some, warranty, etc. Good camera, otschelkal normal staff the other day [censored] L lens, and thought about priobritenii either 30 or 40 e d, as they show themselves better with elkoy + + enough opportunities, and so, whether talknut 400kit for pay and $ 500-600 Dr take 30? understand sprinkle with a sprinkle on, but this has 5 d hard


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Glinok

umnichat enough, good - bad object. Photographers Shoot. Photo - is not a set of lenses, but simply a game of light, shadow, and correct production of the frame. Photograph makes a photographer, not a "right" lenses. Learn to work so that there is. kitovsky lens is suitable for most cases. If someone finds girlfriend - OBOSNUY. show the difference, posted pictures of one object, with different lenses, and tell all what is the difference!


User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Alex12

On a personal note I can say that on my 400D is EF-S 17-85mm f/4.0-5.6 IS US M, which I get together with the purchase. I must confess that I am very pleased with how shtatnik - on 5 with the advantage. And remember - "There are different K IT-s."
And a few words about obektivy "L" class. The people do not run into the prosak obtiki when buying such as in this case need only take expensive analogues with abriviaturoy "IS" - which means the image stabilizer. Otherwise - if you live always with a tripod:)
Who is looking for, he always finds! Good luck!


User Rating: 117-05-2008 / Mikhail

Dima, where the regime sharpness of images 400 D


User Rating: 116-05-2008 / DiMA

If taken, the kenon 400, but without a standard lens. Vibirat, under the lens itself singly or that the multifunctional, such as 28-105, is 300 cu непожалеете.


User Rating: 116-05-2008 / Nobody

try to change the flash card .. I have had this problem on another camera - proved card "left".


User Rating: 115-05-2008 / Dima

The device is very worthy. Lens simple standard. I would take a new lens 28-135 or 28-200. All who wrote that he gave vague photos - please you all understand nasroykah - there is a sharpness of images regime - the slider is the default settings at medium - and therefore very soft photos turn out - those at the maximum glisser - get a very sharp and clear photos. All advise, do not take progadaete. But take better without the lens, and separately buy 28-135.


User Rating: 115-05-2008 / Taras

I do not know яку camera brother SONI 350 chi CENON 400450. poradte.


User Rating: 115-05-2008 / RomSerj

I bought 400D. Excellent camera. But there is problemka, who may face. Delano shot. on-screen displays correct, after making one more shot, go into view, and the first snapshot of written data damaged. So it is not often where 5% of images. Razdrazhet very much, especially when a good shot is spoiled. Subcouncils.


User Rating: 115-05-2008 / Nick

I have a Pentax 100D Super, BOMB apparatus, but little optics. Do not take pairs S anon 400D to him even more optics. A carcass can always change.


User Rating: 114-05-2008 / Nobody

Dear connoisseurs, faces the choice Canon 400D, Sony A100, Nikon D40 and Pentax K100 not from what they read about a lot of good, but only from what it is the only that there is in my province. Help please with the choice, if I may, without sarcasm, price, respectively, $ 1000, $ 933, $ 930 and $ 750


User Rating: 114-05-2008 / Gennady

Slightly tsarapnul display at the camera, under any angle visible tsarapinka 1 cm at the end of the inscriptions Canon. No one tried polished, glass seems very good? Once polirnul glass at Nokii-6200, but there several layers cover, came out malware.


User Rating: 112-05-2008 / Valary

two months as claimed 70-200 f 2.8 with stabilizer! Just delight! No complaints! Weight neither confused nor drops, used instantly. Rotate with 24-70 / 2.8. Shirikov 10-22. Kenon is KENON! All works on 5 +


User Rating: 110-05-2008 / Igor

I absolutely agree. Not offense will be said for other brands (which do not say that worse), but kenonov in pro-segment really overwhelming majority. This is a fact. and with mylnitsy than here? or do you want to say that if your city is actively [censored] tsya "UFO", it means that this super fotik? Never mind ...


User Rating: 109-05-2008 / Nobody

Lord, is another. Look at the football stadiums, the Olympic games, etc. - all of them predominantly in gray lenses large and very large. Or nikon also produces such?


User Rating: 109-05-2008 / Nobody

so you can watch on the TV pictures


User Rating: 209-05-2008 / Shimano

And yet voprosets, whether this will come to the lens 400d
Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC

All thanks!


User Rating: 209-05-2008 / Shimano

Give pliz, this apparatus is video and audio output, and why, he also does not remove the video? Prosvjeta pzhlsta!


User Rating: 105-05-2008 / Raseel

PEOPLE! podskazhyte, please come whether, Tamron 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 Di-II LD ASP IF Macro (Canon) to the Canon 400D, if not under o ydet, something that can advise of such parameters within the $ 500-600 thank in advance ...


User Rating: 105-05-2008 / Nobody

Canon 400D (kit)
+ Canon EF-S 60 mm f/2.8 USM Macro
or Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8 USM Macro


User Rating: 104-05-2008 / Viktoriya

Involve macro, as well as shooting животных.Не insignificant filming in nochnoe time and the main prirode.Vot trebovaniya.chto can advise?
Thanks in advance)))


User Rating: 102-05-2008 / Nobody

All this function simply works only on manual mode ....


User Rating: 301-05-2008 / Igor

Gentlemen 80% to remove the remaining Kenon at Nikon, Pentaks, Olympus and Minolta now judge for themselves than to withdraw with respect Kenonist 20 years


User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Nobody

for the fact that in sport fixed image storyline more important than quality.
filmed at least once more or less decent competitions? outbreak banned research until 3200. with the intensity 4 simply do nothing. gymnasts to extract 1 / 200 will be blurred


User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Alex

And still the question. I have read in previous correspondence, that the difference between 70-200/2, 8 and 70-200/4 practically no past and even better paints. Then why people overpay for intensity, if the picture is worse and more weight?


User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Alex

Bratcy, nobody has not answered me to the previous question. Well, I do not like the EF28-135 and EF100-400 on razreshalke, and no shirokougolnika. Prisovetuyte, what better to commit to cut off the wide, and the average range, but with a resolution, sufficient for the matrix of 10 mp.


User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Alice

I bought a camera Canon EOS Rebel XTi (both written on the case) (in fact this is the same 400D) - can not find in the menu mode shooting RAW. Give, please, why are only L, M, S?


User Rating: 129-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______

For Lyubitelya.
Overpay or not-everyone decides for themselves. Unequivocal no answer. Each manufacturer has a line of cameras at different price. But the difference between 400 and 450 D D will not be great, because above tonnes worth 40 D.


User Rating: 129-04-2008 / vasily

Buy fudzhi 9600 and forget about zerkalki so will be cheaper.


User Rating: 129-04-2008 / Nobody

5D mark and 3 do not want to buy? is much steeper.


User Rating: 128-04-2008 / Alex

Bratcy, prisovetuyte. Withdraw From anon 'th EOS 400D, have glass EF 28-135 and EF 100-400 (Whale speech about not - fuflo, I have never even worn). And there are extender Tamron 1,4 x. I work only in RAW. For good quality pictures, but would like to pokruche glass. With recommend? Does the sense to take 70-200/4, if both keep the old lens? Or if they sell, what to take in return (not for 8 pieces, of course, but within reasonable limits)? Involve actual shooting, a little macro (there are rings and lenses). And what better shirokougolnik take? Maybe sigmovsky, it cheap?


User Rating: 127-04-2008 / amateur

_____ALEKSANDRA PERVOGO______ thank for a comprehensive response, but as to the second part of my question - whether or not to overpay for 400D


User Rating: 126-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______

For Toshik / 24-04-2008 20:25
I gave an overview of virtual CANON 450 D (on 30.03.08, on the same date and differences) with the real CANON 450 D and placed it on:
http://www.thg.ru/forum/showthread.php?s = & threadid = 21538 & perpage = 15 & pagenumber = 9
Or visit http://www.thg.ru, more choices "HARDWARE", then "I FOTOAPPARATY." CANON further 450 D. There appeared and the first photo with him other users.
This review confirmed completely, having already in the review model 450 D, the Chief Editor of 16.04.08. And, something that was used from my review and on any position he had not been rejected or disprove experts. Everything was fine.
P.S. The withdrawal left without my behalf, so duplicated again and add that to Limit c 450D comes with a different lens Whale EF-S 18-55 F/3.5-5.6 IS. This lens slightly finalized, compared with its predecessor, and the stabilization.


User Rating: 126-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______

To give professional Lyubitelya reply.
All lenses CANON marked EF and EF-S leads focal length, given how you write, to 35 mm film. Thus, the whale obetiva EF-S with a focal length (FR) 18-55 F/3.5-5.6; now EFFECTIVE FOKUSNOE DISTANCE (EGF) or real, as you write, is 29-88. These figures EGF FR obtained by multiplying by a factor of converting or sprinkle factor equal to 1.6. This is true for models CANON 350 D, 400 D, 450 D, 20 D 30 D, 40 D and a number of other modifications.


User Rating: 126-04-2008 / amateur

Decided to take the first mirror camera, read a lot of information, but never found - Canon lenses writes at its real focal length, or given to the 35 mm film ( "Dealers consultants" have no idea)? And yet the question idiotic tendency Canon-a - to make their new models worse than the old - preserved in SLR cameras or Canon made an exception here, whether or not changed model 400D their money compared with 350D? Please suggest to knowledgeable people. Thank you in advance.


User Rating: 125-04-2008 / Nobody

For exterior surfaces would damp paper towels to clean monitors. Viseur fotogrushey purged, but on chi c tke matrix and forget to think. if not change for two hundred times a day lenses that need not be in the next couple of years (to prevent dust settling on the matrix, hold the camera down when change optics, in the dust if there is no better opportunity to change lenses altogether).
Work lenses from dust settled on the image of little effect, but if nerviruet can sdut fotogrushey (not medical, Bo zasrete optics talc). Posada fingerprint-then more difficult, first carefully smahivaete dust from the glass very soft brush, then spiral dvideniyami light from the center to the edges gently shall optics lenspenom (yuschaem Google) or cloth wetted solution (but to work in this case must be in plastic gloves, Bo smoete solution to wipe grease from her fingers and then the same will vytirat).


User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Tom

Help please! I bought my first 400D is dzerkalka .... as it brushed and what, when and how it has already shown that it is necessary to clean?


User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Toshik

Hello everyone.
I want to buy as soon as possible zerkalku. But no one can explain the difference between 400d and 450d.
Tell us, that is educate those in the course!


User Rating: 124-04-2008 / D e n

Ta start normal glass, low light sources and many shots poydut.Chto would learn it the most


User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Julia

Guys I am new to this case. I read your correspondence. What is significantly different model 40D ot400 D? I think what to buy. Thanks for your reply.


User Rating: 123-04-2008 / Makarenko

Sorry, incorrectly suggested. Just too many of them have been around cameras. And you, as spetsiaist should have to understand that I wrote about sharpening hover in the viewing mode through the display. Because as it was on fixed sites. I wish you well.


User Rating: 123-04-2008 / well

Full tufta objects altogether, I am on mylnitse and the photos turn out better, with the lenses may not even take pictures! I would try another object!


User Rating: 123-04-2008 / Nobody

Podsazhite stand as the object focus on bezkonechnos

Ritmix RH-122 Sport - recaro sport. Recaro Young Sport microfibre.
Canon Technology. © 2008 All rights reserved.