|
Review Canon EOS 400D
08-08-2008 / A and lk
If you use the card-reader, he would not change the quality of R
A W???
User Rating: 108-08-2008 / Nobody
For 07-08-2008 / Dima
More specifically, that over the lens?
User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Dima
Faced with this problem: on my 400D with whale lens aperture not
less than 4.5 exposed, well т.е.не opens polnostyu.pereproboval
all regimes - does not help ((either 4 or 3.5 or put! Although in
the first couple months after buying everything was OK. подскажите
pliz: this bug or what, I do not do so? thanks.
User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Dima
Faced with this problem: on my 400D with whale lens aperture not
less than 4.5 exposed, well т.е.не opens polnostyu.pereproboval
all regimes - does not help ((either 4 or 3.5 or put! Although in
the first couple months after buying everything was OK. подскажите
pliz: this bug or what, I do not do so? thanks.
User Rating: 107-08-2008 / OLGA
Thank you especially great DENISU and those with him leading cultural
dialogue for detailed recommendations.
I once examine photos, but met on vacation and urgently want to
change the film Minoltu (zerkalka semi-), before that (before'95)
was Zenit, like to shoot nature, but now - children, and made portraits
and premises.
Yet in the recommendations of several confusing. Understand that
I look for-any Cannon, could specify that for my goals to take better
approx $ 800 - $ 1000 and after that I was disappointed in the figure,
may leave the film?
ALL zhelchenostsam: let's pokulturnee and poblagodarnee be at each
other ... it takes less time and text.
User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Nobody
For 05-08-2008 / Alka
Try cleaning contacts usb-ports on the cable and competence. Try
to change himself usb-cable. Try to connect to another photo of
competence.
If not help - bear back into the photo shop.
User Rating: 105-08-2008 / Alka
The people did not see the 450d planted all P.0.ustanovleno, podklyuchaesh
through usb and nichego.Spasite! What may be the reason?
User Rating: 105-08-2008 / Yuri
Take with a fixed focal length 50mm f/1.8 or reliable 50mm f/1.4,
excellent quality, but there is no zoom at all. While perhaps will
miss the wide angle to the walls (if it is a great painting a room
is not large)
User Rating: 103-08-2008 / Vitali
Please advise lens for quality peresemki paintings and murals sten.Zum
nenuzhen.Zaranee big thank you.
User Rating: 102-08-2008 / Sergey
Feelings will be disgruntled schas cheers, but still dare to ask:
And if you take the D400 and G9 and withdraw to the mountains or
automatic say sea, which fotik give more extensive and beautiful
picture?
User Rating: 102-08-2008 / Nobody
As "tezisno describe the main pros? Proffesionalny fix by 85
mm, is very wide aperture. With the motor. Very fast, very sharp.
Net portretnik. Only very expensive, but still expensive L series
lenses. In line "lenses" is a pair of entries and a short
description.
There is much cheaper analog - EF 85mm f/1.8 USM.
User Rating: 101-08-2008 / Sasha
Colleague! A tezisno can describe the main pluses EF 85mm f/1.2L?
Comments about it yesterday in net.Videl magazine.75000 district.
And vygdyadit very appetizing.
Seriously. I understand that this is - portretnik ...
Sam take 24-105 already mestsev 8 and playing in principle with
the diaphragm and settings to solve problems with sharpness and
background. And what could Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM???
User Rating: 131-07-2008 / Nobody
Give Canon kit 400D complete with a good poltinnikom or Canon 450D
kit? C calculation that in future it will have to sell and buy more
professional.
User Rating: 129-07-2008 / Nobody
Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM - for portraits
User Rating: 129-07-2008 / Alexander
sorry to ask a question again bought eos 400 with lens EF-S18-55mm
f/3.5-5.6 no pleasure from the fact подскажите images for a portrait
and landscape coca better lens
User Rating: 128-07-2008 / Chertjonok
hello! podskazhiete: whether to use flash to the zenith of the old
Canon 350d?
User Rating: 128-07-2008 / Chertjonok
hello! podskazhiete: whether to use flash to the zenith of the old
Canon 350d?
User Rating: 128-07-2008 / office worker
Give please good fotiku object to this, I want to take photographs
of nature and people think poltinnik.Vmeste to take the carcass
must meet included 25
And I think over the Nikon D80, it is better to wait for him to
gain or take Kenon? Thank you in advance ...
User Rating: 128-07-2008 / lawyer
Nissin 622. Vedas number 43, the price of 5600, virtually no negative
feedback. The good compatibility with Canon 350, 400.
Slightly more expensive Sigma 500 - 6200, because the real number
42, working with her more difficult.
All recommends using Canon EX 430? 9300 rub. Advantages-work extremely
accurate, simple process of shooting, excellent results. Sam take
the old Sigma 500, because with the flash off rare.
Good luck and masterpieces!
User Rating: 126-07-2008 / Alexander
I bought eos-400 with lens with a 18-55 shots but want a better
lens is better for portrait and landscape
User Rating: 125-07-2008 / Alex
For 25-07-2008 / Alexander
Do not come. Given the sprinkle-matrix factor, EGF this lens will
be around 150-450 mm. Potreta for a bit too much, but for landscape
- even more so.
User Rating: 125-07-2008 / Alexander
Otvette Islam does not zatrudnit.Poydet for landscape and portrait
if premenit lens for EOS-400 EF100-300
User Rating: 124-07-2008 / lawyer
EmA, matrix at 400 D and 30 D are similar in size but differ in
size cells: from 30 D cell (pixel) bigger, so more DD
another signal-processing algorithm, weaker AA-filter before matrix
for more detail (sometimes with the conversion of raw while increasing
sharpness to 7 in the converter DPP appears moire, shumodavom treated
in FSH) For noise-maloshumen in jpeg shumnovat in raw from iso200.
BUT: detalirovka and plasticity of the image is that when applying
fotoshopovskogo shumodava (very moderate) image quality produced
by unattainable for 350 - Tokyo and 400 - ki. Sam have 350 - m,
400 - m, 30 - m. Following the acquisition of 30 - are both ki as
spare camera, sometimes taking with them to the Iasi 400 - and,
in addition to 30 - kay. The same lenses on another (better) working
at 30 - kay. Fotoyacheek size, spacing between them and their location
in one with a 5 D matrix only in size 15 x 23 mm, and because the
image obtained 30 - to a picture is worth close to 5 D. Mylnost
images at 30 - even with no kay whale 18-55.
Equally pictures 30 D and 400 D said that the post-30 shots - Tokyo
as well as being 400 - ethicists, or you shooting in jpeg. 30-ka
requires more dosed converter application settings and filters in
FSH, the image on the screen may seem not quite sharp but when viewing
100% increase immediately visible mikrorezkost high, with good printer
for printing pictures of plasticity-sharp and vysokodetalirovannye
not look flat. 8 MP 30 - Tokyo
User Rating: 124-07-2008 / lawyer
Landscape, macro-optics rezkorisuyuschaya, smyagchnny-portrait drawing.
In fact needed 2 lens. As a portrait can be used Sigmu 28-200 DG
macro (plasticity but not a hard figure) price of about 7500 rubles.,
Landscapes also personally, I take Sigmoy 10-20 DC EX price 15900
rub.Makroobektivy not using, Sigma 28-200 allows enough withdraw
large, with the subsequent processing of FSH.
Sincerely, Lawyer.
User Rating: 123-07-2008 / Igor
Please Give what you want to take the lens 400D for shooting landscapes,
macro, portrait shooting? it is desirable that price was not as
a wing of the aircraft 8-) _ thanks in advance
User Rating: 121-07-2008 / Sasha
Only the second option.
User Rating: 119-07-2008 / serega
Give please neochen good and expensive for this outbreak fotika!
User Rating: 117-07-2008 / Moysha
In principle, all machines are comparable, but if you choose something
between 400 and Dr d80, d80 whale definitely better and work Nikon,
I personally prefer. If there is an opportunity to try himself.
User Rating: 117-07-2008 / Serg
Help please with the choice that best of 3 x SLR cameras Digital
camera Canon EOS 400D or Nikon D60 or D 80 (kit) and then completely
lost already
User Rating: 117-07-2008 / Nobody
(Canon EF-S 18-55) (CANON EF 50 mm f/1.8 II). It is normal?
User Rating: 117-07-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______
For, alas, you do not specify the task, as I asked you. And just
so without looking, you can advise someone who zerkalku and in the
hands not kept. So:
You take for amateur or professional purposes? Do you have experience
shooting in general? Do you know how to work in a photo? Do you
need high-speed serial shooting or not? It is fundamentally important
for you to work autofocus? On what format you want to print? WHAT
DO YOU SPECIFICALLY, SOBIRAETES FOTOGRAFIROVAT? Are you ready to
take costly obetivy or limit the whales?
Then look.
User Rating: 116-07-2008 / Samantha
______ALEKSANDR PERVYY_______
so still that specifically recommend?
User Rating: 116-07-2008 / Alexander
Hello everyone. Give can who knows. You can install the 400d lens
with zenith? Is there a conversion?
User Rating: 113-07-2008 / Max
Question:
I would like to take zerkalku entry-level kitom.V later dokupat
lenses not sobirayus.Kakoy most qualitative \ \ \ "whale \
\ \" of the following brands: Olympus, Canon, Nikon Price has
no znacheniya.Zaranee grateful for concrete response to a specific
question :-)
User Rating: 112-07-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______
For such surveys will be more important lens, although desirable
camera mirror. For the night sky may be needed and lens aperture.
The challenge you have highly specialized, you may still need a
shooting interval? (not offend). Read the usual portraits, landscapes,
architecture and t.d.Snimat better in RAW, and then processed in
the photo.
User Rating: 110-07-2008 / Samantha
There have already been asked what fotik better to take the day
and night sky, who can then detailed response.
User Rating: 109-07-2008 / tt Stu and Ma rt
All very simple! We need to press 10 times shutter, but sneeze careful
liv e vi e w in the 350d will not work if the regime included "video"
and G R S, the truth is another way must be using pliers to remove
a mirror that Vivekananda obscure matrix
User Rating: 108-07-2008 / Nobody
TELL pozhalutssta how to switch Live view in 350D??
please .........
User Rating: 107-07-2008 / Misha
You are right, d400 for weddings and I have, but if something poserezney
withdraw it d80 (the set of glasses available):)
User Rating: 303-07-2008 / EmA
Pacany goni not free, I and D 400 and D 30, on the same picture
quality, with the difference in size. The matrices are one field
berries. Sony Alpha 100, no camera (yuzal before buying 400 D) The
difference 30 - 400 from Tokyo - Tokyo regimes in the shooting and
speed serial shooting. First, bought 30 D (do Wedding photos) and
when it was necessary to connect the brother (as with jobs that
fail) try many, and as a result of 400 D. All 30 flexibility - Tokyo
nahren and unnecessary when shooting weddings, knew would have bought
400 D from the outset, the only handle small, but I bought a battery
pack and all in azhure now. Nikonov level of 400 e, just smoke,
if not already pridiratsya to the quality of photos, la plage AF
number of points - a 3 from Kenona -9, and believe me, they are
very important, object to Nikonam not all fit (starting with d40,
d40H, d60), I about their own or, more precisely fit but no autofocus!
Battery unit to these "kids" prisobachish not, and will
forever hang little finger. Yes, Whale lens is not a fountain, sad
of the fact he and Whale! A whale set to take stands, as well as
the difference between the body and whales are not significant,
is considered the lens as a gift:) But to move from 350 to 400 D
D is not, but for a 5-D, daaa, here you need to strive. 350-ka not
very different from the 400 D spending this money.
User Rating: 103-07-2008 / lawyer
Advise Advise commit second-hand canond30. For only photographing
the sky-at the time. Who would have suggested, what camera is best
suited for shooting day and night soil?
User Rating: 102-07-2008 / Nobody
Tell me what somebody who is better to take fotik shooting day and
especially night sky? Maybe this will work? Preferably in categories
up to 7 or yew UAH cheaper.
User Rating: 101-07-2008 / Igor
kenon released EOS 1000D!!! analogue 400D, but worth didzhik3 and
7 points of focus. and environment-card.
User Rating: 101-07-2008 / Maksimka
Фотік simply super) 2 мысяці koristuyus and дуже zadovoleniy.prikro
що його вже not viroblyayut.uzyav обєктив 50 mm 1.8 pictures super.ale
раджу brother said кітовим obektivom.prikladi Photos can podivitis
here:
http://photoclub.com.ua/author/13452/
User Rating: 130-06-2008 / Gochman
I want to buy zerkalku, until it was couple of digital mylnits such
as Canon 460, 540, 550 Soni W series, but now I want to mirror.
Withdraw all going, and would particularly like to night sky. Give
this fotik please come to this or other kakieto can see?
And what are these data Canon EF-S 17-85mm F4.0-5.6 IS USM?
User Rating: 029-06-2008 / Makarov
Give! I want to buy the first zerkalku for quality trepied. Which
machine is better to choose? Which lenses?
User Rating: 126-06-2008 / Igor
Agree. I just wrote that there conversion. Yes and for the sake
of the experiment, it would be interesting to try.
User Rating: 126-06-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______
Maybe something and fits, but many functions, using adapters that
are not supported. For example, the work stabilizer. With such a
large presence of optics, like CANON, and a NIKON, it is believed
that there was no point in adapters. The need for good lens, you
can meet native optics in each of these 2 - x systems. But if someone
like, please, put adapter.
User Rating: 124-06-2008 / Denis
I do not know that already posovetovat.Eto ultrazumam otnositsya.A
to take ultrazumy generally do not have low resolution rekomenduetsya.U
reduced sharpness larger weight and tsena.K tomuzhe ultrazum without
stab-vessch useless, I really negovoryu about their very low intensity.
In short, more than 300 mm is money to the wind.
BUT IF YOU DO NOT OSTANAVLIVAET I can recommend the current Cenon
70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM. Ponimaesh Just as it has not pofotkaesh
landscapes and how portretnik neochen.Da zoom and then no more than
4.5 But that is all that I can recommend!
I mogby help you better eslib you can say for what purpose you need
to object and what money you raspologaete.Mozhet you need Medium
or dlinnofokusny telezum.A may need ultrozum with an initial broad
uglom.Potomu will wait for additional information from you.
Denis.
User Rating: 123-06-2008 / Alexander (North)
GEORGES,
Letters to zoom 0.7 ... that is, you can see through videoiskatel
70% image .. it only reduces the (pro I kitovsky standard lens)
User Rating: 122-06-2008 / vitaly
What optics to recommend him for 300-400 bucks?
User Rating: 119-06-2008 / Nobody
Today vparil 400D kit 18-55 for $ 600 now will take 40 e but I doubt
tormented че better 30d or 40d. Che compression for Kirov at 40?
Nah, they think of it, if чесно hardship to Z0 yuzal who actually
write 40 or 30! !!))))
User Rating: 119-06-2008 / Nobody
No it there. Fix 50 mm.
User Rating: 118-06-2008 / Georges
Something I did not find information about the zoom lens on the
whale ... He is there at all?
User Rating: 118-06-2008 / Denis
Personally for Victoria to inform you if you have nothing more Activities
that take such FEU.Pomomu not bad replace CCD matritsu.Konechno
тож astronomers now moving to the CCD matrix but FEU pomoymu cheaper
cost.
ASTRONOMY Why? Because only the equipment they use for shooting
in different wavelengths ranging from low to high UV IR izlucheniya.Mozhet
you certainly prevented oshibku.Potomu that if all that you wrote
on full seriously, and I simply nonsense kakayato reluctant to answer.
Camera for smki photos and therefore he is working within the visible
radiation and therefore maximum sensitivity matrix will be within
the 'Vidimoy zone "ie just between UV and infrared camera to
film izlucheniyami.Pytatsya something other than" Apparent
"spectrum-such idiocy that even nehochetsya comment!
Dan.
User Rating: 118-06-2008 / Denis
Generally I agree with that, too, because Nobody nefiga not ponyal.Cho
for "Aura". Can "Areol" or lateral expose neponimayu.Esli
... I remember correctly basis - the infrared radiation the human
eye is invisible but very CCD matrix even sees . Therefore, if used
infrared filtry.Hotya all in teorii.Lichno I have not used such
filters made in neobhodimosti.Teoreticheski infrared filters needed
in shooting at sea скажем.Но povtryu DONT be made as long as necessary
in its application.
Yes you forgot (Nobody) to thank for their assistance in selecting
the analogue kenonovskogo obektiva.Bolshoe thanks.
At the same time express great appreciation for the help Alex.
Dan.
13-06-2008 / Oksana
Tell me please, and whose assembly, it should be?
User Rating: 112-06-2008 / Nobody
For Victoria. Something you naputali. In what is hertz? What you
want to measure the frequency? I think you want to know the range
of wavelengths which registers the camera? manufacturers are unlikely
to give such information. There are, however, several cameras have
a feature photographs of infrared range. Very beautiful landscapes
are obtained. :)
User Rating: 112-06-2008 / Ivan
Uvozhaemye, подскажите please buy a lens to that device .. We need
to zoom was great (etwa 10 - x) well, and that price was not much
kusuchaya. Thank you in advance.
User Rating: 111-06-2008 /. J
че write robbery and was horrified ... I have 400 D. satisfied.
although what difference lovers .. 450D did not take, even though
the live-vyu and many other pleasant plyusikov smallest (and minusikov).
minuses at 400 D - bird cut shirt for pens, and can not get used.
but in general is not particularly zamorachivatsya - 350 - 400 -
450 privyknite to any of the cells. as someone above rightly - better
buy good glasses. duct ozhdidal worst. at ISO1600 neponimayuschie
not understand anything, but if not then pridiratsya and 400 prokanaet.
although not fundamentally zadirayu above 100. Pravda [censored]
fix 50 mm and then see what is really noise. good machine, I am
very satisfied. All nitpicking irrelevant, kaemra it is not super
expensive!
but I wanted to say more. stab at the lens, not only for long excerpts.
; OR
User Rating: 310-06-2008 / Victoria
There I have a question for specialists. This is very important
for one case, which I provernut intentions. For so-called "aura
photos." You do not tell what the lower and upper thresholds
of sensitivity with this camera and have it like EOS 350D in Hz?
I am referring to an open area of the electromagnetic spectrum.
In the technical characteristics of such data, no camera. Thanks
in advance.
User Rating: 010-06-2008 / Nick
Everything. Canon 400D withdrawn from production.
User Rating: 110-06-2008 / Nobody
And what next? 40 lines per mm enough to print a very sharp snapshot
of 40 x 40 cm
User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Vlad
See description !!!?..." maximum resolution - no data? "Everything
is simple:" 3888/22, 2 = 175 (line / mm) or
175 * 25 = 4375 dpi, next, "no data"-derives from the
previous. Incidentally !..., a obektivchik think the resolution
is not more than 40 lines / mm and then at the center.
You can continue to count, especially on CHKH or FPM. This is for
PROFI ...
All Hi ...
User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Alex
They all CCD and CMOS and CCD. Unfortunately simple articles about
the differences and CMOS SS D, I, too, does not. The main difference
in principle with the reader signal matrix - a CCD, he read only
as a whole, with the whole matrix completely, consistently, line
for line, a type of expenditure in the elbow assault rifle cartridges.
A CMOS signal can withdraw from any pixel or group, regardless of
its location on the matrix and you can take the whole matrix at
the same time. In this way increases the speed serial shooting (much
higher than that of the SS D). CMOS really noisy CCD, but much more
economical in production and consumes significantly less energy
for the work. Therefore, and put in their profiles. High-quality
photo on CMOS achieved through large parts svetopriemnoy pixel.
This is related to the design matrices - in profile facing polnokadrovye
matrix (70% svetopriemnoy part of the total area of the matrix),
while compact, and ultrazumah prosyumerah buffering uses a matrix
of columns (only 30% of the total area svetoprimenikov matrix).
I have an article on the general principles of the matrix, if you
will - will give a reference.
User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Vasil
Alex
2.
I want to write you a fresh memory eyes I remembered.
The human eye distinguishes color where it two hundred times more
than the camera.
If you look in the mirror, you often see one when viewing a snapshot
get a little bit different in the sense of color.
Mylnitsa that shows on the monitor accurately and gives it in the
frame and I do not removing frame can fix all that I do not like.
I was filmed in glasses and just do not see some sharp navozhu shot,
sharpness at the center, accounting for color match on beds with
flowers and almost always trust Kalashnikov
If the center does not promazal sharpness highest class.
At 5 Mega working as a sniper using a point not breathe reliance
tripod is not always postavish.
If something super put the timer.
Wee below wrote in the transition from film to figure who is what
it requires.
I Conversely, I like to light peoples' purchasing this machine.
I do not get from home without it more than three years is my friend
(some Chinese sales broken once cut plume) thou bi get Yapontsa
5100 or 5000, I would have taken today.
A company CANON NIKON and they work simultaneously and long.
In the Internet I read this statement NIKON takes half the profits
only for your name!
But his need to win this does not write in the newspaper saying
it is working well, I give blood and sweat and dozens of years.
User Rating: 309-06-2008 / Monseigneur
Since bat.blokom perfect body. His money is .. Nikon number not
valyalsya (40h, 60 - for this class competitors kenonu 400450) ...
450d definitely a better d80 of nikona .. About 40 e silently ..
believe the same d300, currents on the 1000 USD cheaper:) Nikony
- tool losers, kenon - successful photographers ... :) Axiom IMHO
User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Alex
In fact, attempts to abandon the mirrors have already been made.
It was a pair of cameras from Olympus (do not remember exactly,
like E-20), where instead of mirrors stood separation prism. She
razdeleyala luminous flux for the matrix and the viewfinder. But
the negative side (dark viewfinder, mistakes exposure meter) okzalos
enough to have refused from the system.
User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Denis
Zerkalki also add that much more difficult and expensive maintenance
heavier kompaktok (which incidentally have already indicated Alex)
and this is not all shortcomings Zerkalok.NO.Odno large "NO".
All these shortcomings overlap preimushestvami! Of course provided
that this person zerkalkoy able to use (which incidentally also
already mentioned).
I already wrote-FOTOGRAF-gold alloy chamber and cheloveka.Dazhe
fan who enjoys zerkalkoi (also desirable for those who use compact)
simply need to know principle and structure of its fotoapparata.Neobhodimo
not only know the principle of the CCD sensor to know the strengths
and weaknesses CMOS and SSD matrits.Neobhodimo know very, very differently
mnogoe.A zerkalka in the hands of the same and that MARTYSHKA OCHKI!
Very respectfully hope ponimanie.S Den
User Rating: 109-06-2008 / Denis
Alex, I FULLY agree with you that what you write about zerkalku!
At the expense of protecting the mirror-and the truth it can only
mirror now in zerkalke functionally neobhodimo.Pisat budu.Och why
not a lot of text and who DONT and do not understand.
Just write about the size of the matrix (I mean physical size) is
not there for budu.Chto nonsense about matrix kompaktok Nobody wrote
komentariev.Dostoinstvo zerkalok also without Real-lock (and not
as a virtual kompaktok), vydnrzhka, Fizich size of the matrix and
the fact that the matrix of cabinet (and not as in compact bezkorpusnye),
Semnye lenses (truth-dust perennial problem but have to pay for
quality and design over time it will solve) ... In short perecheslyat
ustanesh.Da and add from the fact that the matrix zerkalke include
in the current at the time of shooting power zerkalok - In RAZY
LESS than the kompaktok.
User Rating: 108-06-2008 / Drug
Of course, yes for the quality of assembly, and ergonomics, it is
not very small enough, the lens televik tseplyaesh vasche unrealistic,
and the picture he did, but it nikon vasche lohovskoy divorce, as
a company, which makes for taiwan: - D d80 about it, plus it convenient
enough, and more without words, people just get on with it lave.Pentaks
10 e nikona on its head above, I have not talking about 30.40 d.A
"profffi" 200300d:-D ... Vobsche withdraw all in red.
The only hope nikona d3. Че nenado So all of you to write the type
of [censored] s one I Dartanyan
User Rating: 108-06-2008 / KLenK !!!!!!!!
Polkupat such Nadia is meaningless ........ For many reasons description
below ........ Hotyaby because it is the cheapest with a preliminary
class, and therefore most expensive class with soap will not inferior
in quality and in printsepe and better if search for and compare
nemochny Whale object to kenone d400 ..... want quality mirrors
then buy from nikona d80 and above ..... Protects етот Nadia those
who "lohonulsya" with his choice and is "schaslivym"
holder. printsype in the majority of those who object oriented етот
not have pridstavleniya on trebuvaniyam k5achestva zerkalok because
...........
User Rating: 108-06-2008 / Alex
Semi? Yes do? But light is still reflected.
Do me and "mylnichka" for 500 bucks and a mirror for 1700.
I can not try "to edify on the path of truth" and Tupi
is not going to argue. You can not explore anything. Simply understanding
of the principles of the technology allows you to use it more effectively.
Too many lovers, moving from film to figure beginning to demand
a lot from it. Although a small body of a zoom lens with a decent
range FR, and that without distortion, and that at this lens and
potrtet and macro and landscape could be removed, and day and night
shots класные receive. And while forgetting that the laws of physics,
no one has been cancelled. That raises questions why the matrix
1 / 2, 5 does not give such as the DD format APS-C or FF, or why
the premises are not getting shots, and why zerkalki always take
off faster than CDs. I agree that mirror delivers a number of inconveniences,
but the positive side of their overlap.
User Rating: 107-06-2008 / Alex
Well-to, if it was so and, as you write, something of a mirror long
ago would have refused. But the mirror until needed. First, it somehow
protects the matrix from external influences during the change of
optics. Secondly, constantly exhibit matrix, as in ultrazumah or
compact, very bad. Because it leads to its heating, and thus create
noise. For example, the temperature increase by 9 degrees matrix
increases the noise doubled. The third, larger matrix expensive.
For example, you accidentally brought the camera in the sun, and
your matrix does not vyderazhala such a test. A mirror will not
burn her.
The list goes on, but this is enough. And in the end, with the focus
on pentaprism viewfinder is much easier, because the permission
of your eyes are much higher than that of ext. psevdozerkalki viewfinder
screen. Learn what the CCD, how it works and that affects the quality
of its work. And many of the issues no longer exist by themselves.
User Rating: 107-06-2008 / Nobody
Hi all pros and qmail!
Read "Replacement" "FED 2" "Zeint ET"
"Kiev 19" glue curtains in the "zenith" glides
in and regulate "kieve19".
A kettle подскажите me why modern digital cameras mirror, I never
can understand?
In optical electronic environment chat mirror discourage atom as
tennis rackets, balls in the matrix perekrivaet direct access to
it does not give a direct focus on єкран while you're shooting in
the dark, and if a series of images I salute the quality of such
Verkhovna but need to change this outdated system, we will return
to the sharpness of photos which leads to matte glass screen and
now replaces his sootvtstveno both simpler and more reliable?.
If your lens CANONa 400D no IS USM and then filmed at the same FED
2.
I understand in "Zenita ET" and "Kiev 19" in
the mirror to meet at least not remove the covers of the lens.
Take for example the camera "mylnitsy" as you say, they
are on their technology is far ahead of zerkalok gone!
It is recognized all over time.
Just these machines poor quality of construction.
But the technology is very high class.
I see the bad and glasses off in the automation of the central point
and hope for the machine (at random) 18000 images yet made a major
gaps be made during this time our "Kiev19" 4 would sdohli
Compared with the same class kenonami shots better at 30 percent.
A prostavte them on konveer as zerkalki qualitatively and make them
forget about zerkalkah a year as a film.
The screen is the same mirror. N
User Rating: 306-06-2008 / Vitali
Good times of the day, I have a question - just the other day took
400D, particularly his yuzal have not yet, but lifting the lens
found a protective glass sensor visible atom. How do no harm to
remove them? Ask because of - an entry-level user. Can this fulfil
brush (included in pencil for cleaning lenses)? I would be very
grateful for the professional recommendations.
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody
For Marseilles.
In the three wooden pieces can be purchased only b.u. The best for
you, I think would be a thread ultrazum. This is a great choice.
The same Canon S2, olimpusy series Camedia, Sony early series N
or Panas series FZ. But do not Minoltu. Their metering - that's
not susceptible to common sense, and clear lenses are no different.
Tsifrovik to fix - you can hardly find such. Personally, I have
not seen such Sales (I do not mean to fix zerkalok). But that lenses
with a fixed FR paint a better picture than zoom, so this is true,
although with the caveat - it's necessary to look at the manufacturer
and specifically on the model. The existence of stab - preferably,
but not necessarily.
User Rating: 306-06-2008 / Vlad
I am sincerely sorry people who think that tsyfromylnitsa or ultrazum
zerkalki better. Remember, even with the whales zerkalka GORAZDO
better than any ultrazum fakt.Esli is no money to buy expensive
optics, and you will not need high-quality cameras how. Tsyfromylnitsy
and ultrazumy this type cameras "Navedi and zhmi" have
been developed for ordinary people who can not and will not work
with high-quality equipment to satisfy their primitive appetite.
If Vi hotote not be primitive (prostachkovym) user, you should kachestvennnoy
technology users.
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Mak
Well, there Oliimpus bought 520. Photos class! 30 per cent of all
marriages. But I understood that the quality of Canon 400D above.
Practise godik and [censored] Canon with an expensive lens, and
then Olimpusa the fore fokusiruesh rear loses a little sharpness.
Right at the forum were those who wrote that any better at zerkalka
machine than for example, Canon S5 IS for manual installation. Thank
you kindly to David and nervous Nobody!
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody
Sigma AF 18-50mm F2.8 EX DC (professor)
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody
Tamron SP AF 20-40 mm F/2.7-3.5 (professor)
Tamron AF 17-50 F/2.8 XR DI LD
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Nobody
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Alex
On the lens - not say, I do not know, frankly. Canon EF 17-40mm
f/4.0L USM - just this, though not quite what they need. But you
probably himself know about it. We have to look at other manufacturers.
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Alex
Well, if desired, it can stabilize and do shut down. On the advantages
of systems say that in my opinion shift matrix is more efficient
than moving lens - rely on experience and so, and with others. Of
course, if light enough, then stab better shut down, because any
moving parts has inertia. But, here today, for example, I had to
withdraw on extracts close to 1 / 20. So stab me in handy. Everything
depends on the specific conditions of shooting.
User Rating: 106-06-2008 / Denis
Again согласен.Но I stab in optics has several priimuschestv.Hotya
what difference will be that Engine Group corrective lenses or CCD
matritsa.Prosto pomoemu girodatchiki for more precise optics chtoli.Hotya
all these words in reality I have not used a camera with a built-optical
stabilization . Znaesh Alex some such write that on the contrary
a little stab razmazyvaet картинку.Не знаю.До still stab me from
optical implemented only good for Canon vospominaniya.Da incidentally
neznaesh and whether there is an analogue EF 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM
tlko among Class L . Nenashol and I do that then. 24-105 not help
it.
User Rating: 105-06-2008 / borodatij
please help choose a lens for shooting nature and home ....
User Rating: 105-06-2008 / Alex
Here are poor)))) Dear Nobody! In the body SLR cameras Canon 400D
stabilizer not. For the simple reason that Canon sells mobile lens
stabilization through the lens. Therefore, they put directly into
the lens. If you are so important to stabilize, then you'll have
to buy a lens with the stabilizer. Or look to the side of Pentax.
For example Pentax K20D. They stab implemented on a shift in the
matrix and ustanavlyavayutsya cameras themselves. Sam stabilizer
is not the quality of the photo does not have any influence. It
allows you to withdraw longer extracts (you can increase by 2-3
foot). So, compliance, reduces the risk smazany get shot when shooting
with hands, compensating for camera shake.
05-06-2008 / Denis
Although zerkalki and more natural size of the matrix and therefore
clarity above and below the noise to have a negative storona.K and
large-sized matrix trebuetsa big obektivy.SRAVNIVAY SAM!
I had the S3-IS whose object roughly the equivalent of 20-430 mm,
with lights f/2.8 at the brief trube.U kitovskogo same lenses EOS400D
equivalent to 18-55 mm in svetochuvstvit at the brief trumpet f/3.5-5.6
So much for your denetsya priimuschestvo zerkalki in svetochuvstvit
matrix (at 400D ISO-800 at high noise visible) before svetochuvstvit
kompakta.A where ultrazum denetsya.Ya do not say that there is S5
optical stabilizer on a whale of 400D net.I certainly S5 USM to
drive a Focus on the whale to 400D net.I add that to withdraw a
whale lenses to zerkalki (at least 400D) - zerkalku vykinut.A easier
with decent object to stab zerkalki cheaper than 27000-30000 rublikov
you do not naydesh.I IN WHEN YOU SKOKA ZERKALKA OBOYDETSYA Camera
case and even if they add?
Sincerely Denis.
User Rating: 104-06-2008 / Denis
Dear Mak.Ya forced to agree to the entire Nobody. Although he rezok.Vo
too early to start - Photographer gold alloy this man and his camera
fotoapparata.Snimaet not a person through fotoapparata.Ya would
like to say that if you zadaesh question "steeper Is the CD
zerkalki "then you have to take zerkalku rano.esli dumaesh
that you buy poluprofessionalku level EOS40D or fotik with full-matrix
immediately stanesh Prof. shots-do you strongly oshibaeshsya.U zerkalki
and compact except that they both use electronic CCD sensor (battery-charging
device with a backward linkage) is not anything to do! Ponimaesh
ZERKALKA-far more complex than say kopakt device and use it extremely
difficult! Ponimaesh a compact with the image sensor constantly
comes in the viewfinder and on the same displey.U zerkalki opposite
you all through optical vidish system and a group zerkal.I only
at the time of shooting oprakidyvaetsya mirror and cast light on
matritsu.Uzhe in this extraordinary complexity zerkalke.Esli shooting
at you through half the CD pressing Morocco descent vootchiyu uvidish
desplee dark on whether or not to be such that you fotografiya.Ved
vidish the same as that sees and sees such matritsa.I before making
frame uvidish histogram on whether to add or turnover ubavit чувствительность.То
zerkalke need to pre-establish the sensitivity and then looking
to extract additional nastroykah.V think about what eventually uvidish
you receive a current photo after the second though semki.Vo
User Rating: 004-06-2008 / Nobody
without stabilizer photos will be much worse? ! someone help me
or not! I have a week to search for a good fotik! help please!
User Rating: 104-06-2008 / Mak
Well, how would you explain. I bought a Canon S5 IS. Car just super!
And zoom 12, and turning the video display and withdraw what I have
not seen on video cameras, but the pictures are not very, some razmazannye.
Well, I do not born to be surgeon! CAUSES. Of course you want to
be able to withdraw, but there is another side of this coin. ISO
above 200 will not even such a kettle as I have seen noises, a short
excerpt is not done, fotik begins to shout that the shot will be
dark, even with the best coverage. I think that with me zerkalkoy
be even easier. Although the percentage of marriages would be lower.
User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Nobody
What is better than the figures? This digital camera, rather than
film! A clear and sharp picture with good weather can be obtained
from any camera ...
User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Mak
Not quite so. I understand that if I take Zerkalnuyu camera and
cellphone at the brief excerpt object, the picture with good weather
will be clear and quite sharp. In any case better than the numbers.
User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Nobody
Yes what a difference that you buy? Olympus, kenon, nikon ... They
still do not remove themselves well! Buy at least something and
enjoy shooting, and then you just go and look at them .. Meaning?
User Rating: 103-06-2008 / Mak
Thank you, Dennis! My misery continued at the choice fotika the
seventh consecutive day. Today, I suggested Olympus S 410 SE KIT.
It stands to stab lens can be removed through the monitor, as well
as test shots almost from the D400. Over 300 euros think you can
take to taste, but the D450 for 700 too many. about may have any
other options?
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis
Dear Mak. Generally speaking honestly if something stab piece poleznaya.Prilichny
stab withdraw allows for large vyderzhkah.A chrevychayno is useful
in the conduct of shooting in low light conditions or when large
glubene sharpness.
Stabia may be different-Optical stab, Electronic and combi stab.Elektronny
stab-stab fuflo as enjoyed by internal resources as well as fotika
fotki.V result quality pictures strongly uhudschaetsya.Optich stab
thing-but he raspalagaetsya exclusively in the optical system is
обьектива.То has fotik stab or not all ravno.Naoborot-camera stabilizer
without much luchshe.Optich stabilizer is indicated in the brand
IS lenses but object to stab optical and often more expensive tyazhelee.Yarky
example ultrozumovy CD series from Canon Sx-IS (I personally S3
- IS). So-finding zerkalki EOS 400D 450D eplohie amateur zerkalki.A
stab if needed (you and he is very confident and very useful), then
take a acc stab.Da and note that the object of kitovsky 400D without
a stab in kitovsky 450D vstroen.I stab another supplement that zerkalku
going to need some material resursy.Prilichnye transfokalnye lenses
even more so with stab stand in most cases very expensive fotoapparata.I
last council NEVER BERI TELE ZUM lenses without a stab-pomoymu is
a waste of time. Because all the same to the tube with a maximum
of hands produced a continuous soap.
User Rating: 202-06-2008 / Kolos
Recently acquired D400. A choice to take Nikon or Canon. Advised
me vzyat450. But it was not available. Now I want to buy a good
lens for shooting portraits. Encourage what is good. Thank you in
advance.
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / ziko
подскажите me as lovers! This photo will be much better than conventional
compact fotik?
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Mak
Gentlemen, I almost novichek. I wish 400D, but I am afraid because
it without stbilizatora. So whether it is scared?
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / lawyer
Re David.
Universal lenses does not exist. There lenses for the range of
tasks. The most versatile for typical works of amateur FR lens with
a range of 17 to 200 mm. Of the existing market-optimum Kanon 17-85f
4-5.6 (equivalent to sprinkle 27.2 mm-136 mm.
For specials. tasks (effective landscapes, rakursnaya survey) optimum
Sigma 10-20 f 4.5-5.6 (pribl.14000 rub) ,12-24 f 4-5.6 (pribl.17000
river, suitable for 24 h36). In selecting the zoom apply the rule
"more multiplicity-less quality."
Best regards
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Igor
Sorry if offended. Buy lens for a particular purpose, rather than
simply looking at price. And for those who have not decided that
I want to say that you can buy the lens and for 2-3 thousand cu,
but it does not guarantee you a good picture. All good luck!
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis
Eyes are afraid hands delayut.Tak pomoymu govoritsya.Esli who worked
with Canon let even with the relatively easy komkaktami privyknet
and their zerkalke.Tak смело.Ну or take that first before buying
in the hands oprobuy.Uveren ponravitsya.A to the test photos.
I watched a photo devchenki what to.Snyato class but simply that
such a quality order from the whale lenses ... Neznayu if that is
possible when ideal conditions, and only for pros.
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis
Well, for bayonet can not face it so raschitan.U I also faces EF
70-200mm f / 4 L IS USM. Neudobno course согласен.Но pay for the
quality nado.V any case can warm themselves thought that EF 70-200mm
f / 2.8 L IS USM - more than twice tyazhelee.A EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6
IS albeit slightly easier but in quality and harrakteristikam him
before EF 70-200mm f / 4 L IS-far
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis
And even mention that if you saw this zloschastnuyu letter S in
the EF-S is a risk and take notice EF-S-bayonet specials under sprinkle-matritsu.Esli
want to do something to make comments on them please suschestvu.A
it if you do not like I have proposed a set of lenses, to explain
why you think my selection of a wrong and even then svoi.A of these
lenses will be easier for humans choose the one that he nuzhen.A
prediratsya if you want it to the entire glupo.Tak as okanchatelno
confuse those whom we trying to help in the selection.
Sincerely Denis.
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis
I thank Igor zamechanie.Spravedlivosti for the sake EOS450D note
that I really do not in the hands держал.То that stab in kitovskom
glass to him have tested знал.Но kitovskoe glass of EOS400D hesitate
to recommend kitovskoe and glass from the 450D. I can recommend
only what comes in the hands and then I have no complaints вызвало.Не
can certainly say that I am an experienced amateur and much more,
I do not профи.Но on my face EOS400D lenses EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS
USM and EF 70-200mm f / 4 L IS USM. These lenses course тож недостатки.Но
their lenses at what they do not exist. So I recommended these lenses
because I enjoyed them and for all time, serious narikany them nebylo.Oba
these lenses kitovskogo much better (at least from exactly 400D)
If you think that distinguished Igor above lenses marked me wrong
choice then of their . But in any case, even if I am wrong and you
do not have the right to offend me and to stand as an idiot who
necherta not knowing in photographs and even in the hands nederzha
fotika neither glass nor has the courage and audacity of whom either
rekomendovat.Ochen hope for your understanding. I repeated that
at the expense kitovskogo lenses to 450D and the sky, I might as
rights to use these lenses, I do not have to even deeper to my сожалению.Но
I reinsurance.
User Rating: 102-06-2008 / Denis
And I said that unless the letter S in the brand-lenses means любительская.Ну
now tell me where you lenses in the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM-saw
the letter S. Read need closer look. IS-stab. DO-lens of glass with
low dispersion pomoymu. USM-engine focus and so dalee.Esli closer
look you notice that read something I wrote a series of S-любительская.Но
unless I wrote in the letter that the brand lenses mean amateur
User Rating: 101-06-2008 / dani
подскажите a Canon EOS 400D, kit includes optics or not? if so,
it is good or not? me as lovers and whether to borrow or rent a
camera for $ 200-300 a small conventional digital photo camera?
big difference? otvette pliiiiizzz !!!!!!
User Rating: 101-06-2008 / D e n
Blin all kicked whale although initially normal glass, 3 months
otfotkal them understand that you need more, but about good lenses,
are all good with markirovochkoy L personally, I bought a 70-200L
and understood that e 400 is not suitable to it, ie picture but
cool Convenience enough kills derzhesh trimya his fingers, even
with a heavy focus glass hand to put the problem clearly, and I
still wave over the bayonet ..... vobschem [censored] and I take
the good old 30 village ....
User Rating: 101-06-2008 / and
You ponapisyvali such that the head does not nalazit! :) What is
then the "S" - series, as you called it, amateur? The
letter "S" in the title is not said that the amateur lens.
Do not tell! Rzhunemogu .....
User Rating: 101-06-2008 / Igor
Is not! new 18-55 IS precisely with the stabilizer. The lens is
very good and very sharp! Do not believe people who camera and then
never in the hands not kept. If you take 450 D, the courage to buy
whale 18-55 IS, not regret.
User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Denis
Please excuse that вмешиваюсь.Но listen soveta.Beri imagine 400
or 450D from scratch but they do not takiezh and expensive and eyes
and lenses from the eyes snachala.Kameru think you can imagine and
smenish and lenses ostanutsya.Ochen not advise on the whale or the
other brat.POZhALEESh.Svetosila horror-not as weak stab and no permission
sludge not to mention the problems with fokusirovkoy.Esche again
ask before buying the eyes and lenses podumat.Kachestvo pictures
in the eyes of lenses depends mainly because fotike current matrix.
User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Denis
Privetstvuyu.Kak you understand bavaet not one but a steep obektiva.Zaranee
govoryu.Kitovsky object-shit complete and suitable as a current
Diverters fotiku.
Lenses are divided into Makroobektiva-(makrosemka), Panoramniki
(Shiroekougolniki)-panorama fotkat.Standartnye (Portretnik)-Rights
fotkat, Tele-object for shooting wildlife.
The same lenses are divided into two classes at a price-(U Canon
is "S" - or series of amateur and "L" - a series
or professional). I recommend a professional because although they
are expensive but water and dust protected shell and excellent quality
stekla.Esli you want fotkat nature of people and I would suggest
you following obektivy.Dlya EOS400D This EF 70-200mm f/4.0 L IS
USM (Prof object of kenon) and EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM (amateur
Objects as a series of analogies from Prof. personally I do not
nashol). I do not know your experience with obrasheniya zerkalkami
father and apologize for the upper truth.
If you have questions write to me at all mylo.Otvechu interface
you questions because to me difficult to mention all the nuances
here.
User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Mak
Three days sitting looked at the pictures in the test http://wwwnew.dpreview.com/gallery/,
I believe that the best from the 400D. The most natural colors,
realistic scenes. Better than Nicon D40 and others. And, interestingly,
this survey was conducted, "Kitovym" lens or with another,
more classroom? And it would be dishonest. I am a fan, I would like
very canon 400D, but I fear it will be very inconvenient to use.
User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Konstantin
All greetings! People, help is now looking at pictures of competence
in the properties of data about the photographs. There is a parameter:
rareshenie horizontal and vertical resolution (measured in pixels
per inch), and so, from photographs made with digital cameras with
a large number megapiseley is horizontal and vertical resolution
of less than images made with fewer cameras megapixel camera. As
is understood and what it says??
User Rating: 131-05-2008 / Nobody
I have both the camera. finding one - if
zarabatvaete not at this money - it anyway. and if so - that kenon.
olimpusa pluses - weight, size, color, GEAR, two different whale
in the set. compared with kenona whales - just super.
kenona - a range that noise.
in conditions of poor illumination, concerts, etc. -- Kenon better.
By the day, or up to 8-10 meters evening - olik. good color and
sharpness.
User Rating: 130-05-2008 / Shimano
Gentlemen!
Who still tell what Ribel XTI?
It seems like I heard that's associated with battery charging,
amerikosskaya type and we hrenovo works for a different voltage
network ...
Mr. and vayt boxing sho this?, теж tsikavo:)
Thank you all!
User Rating: 129-05-2008 / Vitos
yuzal who, how many missing acclamation?
User Rating: 228-05-2008 / REBEL
Three weeks, as has a 400D. It is quite satisfied. Took over in
Samara 21630. Kit, complete termosublimatsionny printer and consumable
materials. This is my first zerkalka. Very satisfied. Spent already
a couple of commercial orders.
User Rating: 328-05-2008 / Santiaga
All greetings, already seen in this forum to discuss and compare
Olympus E-510 and Canon 400D, but vsezhe still want to clarify.
Maybe someone from there is the experience of working with Olympus
and Canon together. What did better? At Olympus there are any type
GEAR stabolizatora, LivePreview, etc., which have no Canon, whether
they are qualitative, especially stabilizer, and that even better.
On the choice of optics for Olympus or Canon in my town no problems.
Thanks in advance!
User Rating: 128-05-2008 / Katuwwka
and not tell that who has this Verkhovna: function WITHOUT OUTBREAKS
it good? quality photographs? if for example in the room or in the
job in the place where would mylnitse avtovspyshka involved?
User Rating: 128-05-2008 / Vitos
but as a matrix to the CCD or CMOS?
write all that noisy CMOS
User Rating: 127-05-2008 / Nobody
White Box - camera, which was discovered marriage, they are refined
at the plant and running again for sale. All this legally. In fact,
many professionals advise them to take it - Canon well eliminates
defects, but on the new "normal" marriage can still find
... Of course, guarantee that something difficult, but such opinion
exists:)
User Rating: 127-05-2008 / Leyla
Nobody, подскажите pliz, I understand that White box-this apparatus,
which has some minor flaws? But in principle it working? and that
means Rebel Xti almost everywhere it is? I see that the carcass
is easier to buy and so far that one but a good lens than whale
18-55. spba
User Rating: 127-05-2008 / A1
At the normal price 400D in Kiev has already dismantled - in warehouses
No, now wait 450:)
User Rating: 126-05-2008 / Nobody
55-250 and 28-200 is not bad
but they are few and everything depends on the category tseovoy
User Rating: 125-05-2008 / Leyla
Spoken at once - I - not proffi.
People, подскажите pliz, I want to take the 400 "carcass"
and a pair of lenses. One 50, I understand there to shoot close,
and the second at the distance (or better vasche whale, and if the
whale what, there are also looking at different tricks.) In stores
did not suggest any rules mogut.Itog: better whale or bird cut "and
if Whale what. Thank you.
25-05-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Bone.
If you buy exactly 400 D, then it goes without lens stabilization.
It is quite cheap, so you decide: you want it or not. If you do
not make special requirements for the photos, he may well you treble.
By 450 D is somewhat improved optically EF-S 18-55 ... IS, which,
moreover, is stabilized.
User Rating: 124-05-2008 / Bone
say he is good and the whale lens or all buy and immediately change
obektiv.iz of what such a hype.
User Rating: 123-05-2008 / Vica
I bought a week ago with a whale lens. Very happy image, and let
all swearing at the whale, but I like a man who keeps in the hands
of his first camera, all satisfied. Surprise that focuses in complete
darkness in the street. While at the machine off, but gradually
open up for themselves all the new features. Words: nothing very
satisfied with their choices))
User Rating: 123-05-2008 / Nobody
For PTlens distortion is a plug-in ImageMaster from Richard Rosenman
Lens distorion corrector (or pro for denyuzhki)
but in this apparatus of distortion and no more than 0.3 is very
cool! 1
User Rating: 123-05-2008 / Yury
Alexandre.
Pomoemu, distortion in ImageMaster can not be eliminated, although
the term can be corrected. Maybe Transform-> Warp in the eighth
and ninth version not? Distortion and the prospect of concepts are
not clear. Popravte if I am wrong.
User Rating: 323-05-2008 / Victor
400D body digital-only fotik without a lens in komlekte, 400D kit-lens
kit with 18-55 mm (highly recommend to take the set, precisely because
the wide angle you need, but from 28 mm to 400 -... - not kay suitable
as a wide, in close space without 18 -... not do, options 18-200
mm may be even worse). Generally Whale 18-55 mm is not bad (for
the best technical quality of images will have to pay USD 350 and
counting), he By udelyvaet any, even expensive mylnitsu:), the Council
also take 50 mm1.8 (80ue)-for portraits and shooting in polumrake:)
But beyond themselves understand that you need!
Read the photographer, not machines, if the 400 e Chn not succeed,
then SURE, and the marks do not get:) Monitor light, color, background,
perspective, plot and everything can be!
User Rating: 123-05-2008 / vitaly
40 no worse than 30, just unnecessarily expensive:)
User Rating: 122-05-2008 / D e n
Bribery today 70-200 L usm, tyazhelenky feel that vyrvet bayonet,
of course differences in quality and the camera lens can be seen
immediately, and all will now класно gyroscope three 400kit for
$ 600 extra cost and have yet to take 30D Sales Sato 40 pomoemu
will be worse
User Rating: 122-05-2008 / sashanek
I EFS 18-55mm not say that they are, quite cool and pictures without
a tripod.
User Rating: 122-05-2008 / kirill
_____ for ALEXANDER PERVOGO______
Thank you for the answer probably still dwell on sony a300
User Rating: 122-05-2008 / David
Dear Lawyer.
I-"teapot" which likes to take photographs (400D)
and does not like to change lenses Could you recommend a universal
lens for an amateur, not necessarily Canon
User Rating: 122-05-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Cyril and amateur.
In particular model when photographing picture does not appear on
the display. " The name of this feature LIVE VIEW and is present
in a limited form in CANON 40D and in full in the new model CANON
450D.
CANON NINON Optics and inconsistent because of bayoneta and not
suited to each other.
User Rating: 121-05-2008 / amateur
Connoisseurs, подскажите whether to Canon 400D optics from Nikon,
apologize if an idiotic question.
User Rating: 120-05-2008 / Nobody
Pravda, the same apparatus mirror!
User Rating: 120-05-2008 / kirill
подскажите Was it that when photographing picture does not appear
on the display
User Rating: 120-05-2008 / kirill
First thought to commit themselves sonku N9 but dissuading friend
and said take zerkalku
now faces the choice following modelik NADEYUS FOR YOUR HELP
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200, Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 or the Canon EOS 400D
Canon EOS 350D who can tell about these modelki that it is better
User Rating: 120-05-2008 / Nobody
What is the difference in the canon ... digital camera and canon
.... kit
and as you vobsche 2 camera 350 and 400 better than what is the
difference
User Rating: 119-05-2008 / Zmey
подскажите please different than canon eos 400D digital and canon
eos 400D kit is better?
User Rating: 218-05-2008 / Mikhail
Dima, thank settings for sharpness of images, photos markedly improved
on my 400 D.
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / ___ ALEXANDER PERVYY___
For Sashi.
Programs are needed for the conversion of RAW-files in TIFF or JPEG,
for correcting the white balance for color, to change the exposure
to (RAW-Files) saturation, and much more.
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Sasha
Colleagues! What do programs that are attached to the camera?
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Dima
to "Michael"
Menu button - 2 menu - "style image" (which бі make edits
- click "jump") - Tien slider sharpness almost to the
maximum (photos turn out less blurry). Remember when photographing
select user preferences - button set
Either way № 2 - buy a new lens:)))
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / miha
greetings to all, please help'd like to choose either fotik kenon
G9 or zerkalku 400D. want to learn from the G9 is a priority and
aperture priority excerpts and what he viewfinder .... please help
....
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Gelios
Video output for viewing on TV
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / D e n
All greetings 4 months ago i bought 400 tons to all legally not
fawn some, warranty, etc. Good camera, otschelkal normal staff the
other day [censored] L lens, and thought about priobritenii either
30 or 40 e d, as they show themselves better with elkoy + + enough
opportunities, and so, whether talknut 400kit for pay and $ 500-600
Dr take 30? understand sprinkle with a sprinkle on, but this has
5 d hard
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Glinok
umnichat enough, good - bad object. Photographers Shoot. Photo -
is not a set of lenses, but simply a game of light, shadow, and
correct production of the frame. Photograph makes a photographer,
not a "right" lenses. Learn to work so that there is.
kitovsky lens is suitable for most cases. If someone finds girlfriend
- OBOSNUY. show the difference, posted pictures of one object, with
different lenses, and tell all what is the difference!
User Rating: 118-05-2008 / Alex12
On a personal note I can say that on my 400D is EF-S 17-85mm f/4.0-5.6
IS US M, which I get together with the purchase. I must confess
that I am very pleased with how shtatnik - on 5 with the advantage.
And remember - "There are different K IT-s."
And a few words about obektivy "L" class. The people do
not run into the prosak obtiki when buying such as in this case
need only take expensive analogues with abriviaturoy "IS"
- which means the image stabilizer. Otherwise - if you live always
with a tripod:)
Who is looking for, he always finds! Good luck!
User Rating: 117-05-2008 / Mikhail
Dima, where the regime sharpness of images 400 D
User Rating: 116-05-2008 / DiMA
If taken, the kenon 400, but without a standard lens. Vibirat, under
the lens itself singly or that the multifunctional, such as 28-105,
is 300 cu непожалеете.
User Rating: 116-05-2008 / Nobody
try to change the flash card .. I have had this problem on another
camera - proved card "left".
User Rating: 115-05-2008 / Dima
The device is very worthy. Lens simple standard. I would take a
new lens 28-135 or 28-200. All who wrote that he gave vague photos
- please you all understand nasroykah - there is a sharpness of
images regime - the slider is the default settings at medium - and
therefore very soft photos turn out - those at the maximum glisser
- get a very sharp and clear photos. All advise, do not take progadaete.
But take better without the lens, and separately buy 28-135.
User Rating: 115-05-2008 / Taras
I do not know яку camera brother SONI 350 chi CENON 400450. poradte.
User Rating: 115-05-2008 / RomSerj
I bought 400D. Excellent camera. But there is problemka, who may
face. Delano shot. on-screen displays correct, after making one
more shot, go into view, and the first snapshot of written data
damaged. So it is not often where 5% of images. Razdrazhet very
much, especially when a good shot is spoiled. Subcouncils.
User Rating: 115-05-2008 / Nick
I have a Pentax 100D Super, BOMB apparatus, but little optics. Do
not take pairs S anon 400D to him even more optics. A carcass can
always change.
User Rating: 114-05-2008 / Nobody
Dear connoisseurs, faces the choice Canon 400D, Sony A100, Nikon
D40 and Pentax K100 not from what they read about a lot of good,
but only from what it is the only that there is in my province.
Help please with the choice, if I may, without sarcasm, price, respectively,
$ 1000, $ 933, $ 930 and $ 750
User Rating: 114-05-2008 / Gennady
Slightly tsarapnul display at the camera, under any angle visible
tsarapinka 1 cm at the end of the inscriptions Canon. No one tried
polished, glass seems very good? Once polirnul glass at Nokii-6200,
but there several layers cover, came out malware.
User Rating: 112-05-2008 / Valary
two months as claimed 70-200 f 2.8 with stabilizer! Just delight!
No complaints! Weight neither confused nor drops, used instantly.
Rotate with 24-70 / 2.8. Shirikov 10-22. Kenon is KENON! All works
on 5 +
User Rating: 110-05-2008 / Igor
I absolutely agree. Not offense will be said for other brands (which
do not say that worse), but kenonov in pro-segment really overwhelming
majority. This is a fact. and with mylnitsy than here? or do you
want to say that if your city is actively [censored] tsya "UFO",
it means that this super fotik? Never mind ...
User Rating: 109-05-2008 / Nobody
Lord, is another. Look at the football stadiums, the Olympic games,
etc. - all of them predominantly in gray lenses large and very large.
Or nikon also produces such?
User Rating: 109-05-2008 / Nobody
so you can watch on the TV pictures
User Rating: 209-05-2008 / Shimano
And yet voprosets, whether this will come to the lens 400d
Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 DC
All thanks!
User Rating: 209-05-2008 / Shimano
Give pliz, this apparatus is video and audio output, and why, he
also does not remove the video? Prosvjeta pzhlsta!
User Rating: 105-05-2008 / Raseel
PEOPLE! podskazhyte, please come whether, Tamron 18-250mm F3.5-6.3
Di-II LD ASP IF Macro (Canon) to the Canon 400D, if not under o
ydet, something that can advise of such parameters within the $
500-600 thank in advance ...
User Rating: 105-05-2008 / Nobody
Canon 400D (kit)
+ Canon EF-S 60 mm f/2.8 USM Macro
or Canon EF 100 mm f/2.8 USM Macro
User Rating: 104-05-2008 / Viktoriya
Involve macro, as well as shooting животных.Не insignificant filming
in nochnoe time and the main prirode.Vot trebovaniya.chto can advise?
Thanks in advance)))
User Rating: 102-05-2008 / Nobody
All this function simply works only on manual mode ....
User Rating: 301-05-2008 / Igor
Gentlemen 80% to remove the remaining Kenon at Nikon, Pentaks, Olympus
and Minolta now judge for themselves than to withdraw with respect
Kenonist 20 years
User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Nobody
for the fact that in sport fixed image storyline more important
than quality.
filmed at least once more or less decent competitions? outbreak
banned research until 3200. with the intensity 4 simply do nothing.
gymnasts to extract 1 / 200 will be blurred
User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Alex
And still the question. I have read in previous correspondence,
that the difference between 70-200/2, 8 and 70-200/4 practically
no past and even better paints. Then why people overpay for intensity,
if the picture is worse and more weight?
User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Alex
Bratcy, nobody has not answered me to the previous question. Well,
I do not like the EF28-135 and EF100-400 on razreshalke, and no
shirokougolnika. Prisovetuyte, what better to commit to cut off
the wide, and the average range, but with a resolution, sufficient
for the matrix of 10 mp.
User Rating: 130-04-2008 / Alice
I bought a camera Canon EOS Rebel XTi (both written on the case)
(in fact this is the same 400D) - can not find in the menu mode
shooting RAW. Give, please, why are only L, M, S?
User Rating: 129-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Lyubitelya.
Overpay or not-everyone decides for themselves. Unequivocal no answer.
Each manufacturer has a line of cameras at different price. But
the difference between 400 and 450 D D will not be great, because
above tonnes worth 40 D.
User Rating: 129-04-2008 / vasily
Buy fudzhi 9600 and forget about zerkalki so will be cheaper.
User Rating: 129-04-2008 / Nobody
5D mark and 3 do not want to buy? is much steeper.
User Rating: 128-04-2008 / Alex
Bratcy, prisovetuyte. Withdraw From anon 'th EOS 400D, have glass
EF 28-135 and EF 100-400 (Whale speech about not - fuflo, I have
never even worn). And there are extender Tamron 1,4 x. I work only
in RAW. For good quality pictures, but would like to pokruche glass.
With recommend? Does the sense to take 70-200/4, if both keep the
old lens? Or if they sell, what to take in return (not for 8 pieces,
of course, but within reasonable limits)? Involve actual shooting,
a little macro (there are rings and lenses). And what better shirokougolnik
take? Maybe sigmovsky, it cheap?
User Rating: 127-04-2008 / amateur
_____ALEKSANDRA PERVOGO______ thank for a comprehensive response,
but as to the second part of my question - whether or not to overpay
for 400D
User Rating: 126-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Toshik / 24-04-2008 20:25
I gave an overview of virtual CANON 450 D (on 30.03.08, on the same
date and differences) with the real CANON 450 D and placed it on:
http://www.thg.ru/forum/showthread.php?s = & threadid = 21538
& perpage = 15 & pagenumber = 9
Or visit http://www.thg.ru, more choices "HARDWARE", then
"I FOTOAPPARATY." CANON further 450 D. There appeared
and the first photo with him other users.
This review confirmed completely, having already in the review model
450 D, the Chief Editor of 16.04.08. And, something that was used
from my review and on any position he had not been rejected or disprove
experts. Everything was fine.
P.S. The withdrawal left without my behalf, so duplicated again
and add that to Limit c 450D comes with a different lens Whale EF-S
18-55 F/3.5-5.6 IS. This lens slightly finalized, compared with
its predecessor, and the stabilization.
User Rating: 126-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
To give professional Lyubitelya reply.
All lenses CANON marked EF and EF-S leads focal length, given how
you write, to 35 mm film. Thus, the whale obetiva EF-S with a focal
length (FR) 18-55 F/3.5-5.6; now EFFECTIVE FOKUSNOE DISTANCE (EGF)
or real, as you write, is 29-88. These figures EGF FR obtained by
multiplying by a factor of converting or sprinkle factor equal to
1.6. This is true for models CANON 350 D, 400 D, 450 D, 20 D 30
D, 40 D and a number of other modifications.
User Rating: 126-04-2008 / amateur
Decided to take the first mirror camera, read a lot of information,
but never found - Canon lenses writes at its real focal length,
or given to the 35 mm film ( "Dealers consultants" have
no idea)? And yet the question idiotic tendency Canon-a - to make
their new models worse than the old - preserved in SLR cameras or
Canon made an exception here, whether or not changed model 400D
their money compared with 350D? Please suggest to knowledgeable
people. Thank you in advance.
User Rating: 125-04-2008 / Nobody
For exterior surfaces would damp paper towels to clean monitors.
Viseur fotogrushey purged, but on chi c tke matrix and forget to
think. if not change for two hundred times a day lenses that need
not be in the next couple of years (to prevent dust settling on
the matrix, hold the camera down when change optics, in the dust
if there is no better opportunity to change lenses altogether).
Work lenses from dust settled on the image of little effect, but
if nerviruet can sdut fotogrushey (not medical, Bo zasrete optics
talc). Posada fingerprint-then more difficult, first carefully smahivaete
dust from the glass very soft brush, then spiral dvideniyami light
from the center to the edges gently shall optics lenspenom (yuschaem
Google) or cloth wetted solution (but to work in this case must
be in plastic gloves, Bo smoete solution to wipe grease from her
fingers and then the same will vytirat).
User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Tom
Help please! I bought my first 400D is dzerkalka .... as it brushed
and what, when and how it has already shown that it is necessary
to clean?
User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Toshik
Hello everyone.
I want to buy as soon as possible zerkalku. But no one can explain
the difference between 400d and 450d.
Tell us, that is educate those in the course!
User Rating: 124-04-2008 / D e n
Ta start normal glass, low light sources and many shots poydut.Chto
would learn it the most
User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Julia
Guys I am new to this case. I read your correspondence. What is
significantly different model 40D ot400 D? I think what to buy.
Thanks for your reply.
User Rating: 123-04-2008 / Makarenko
Sorry, incorrectly suggested. Just too many of them have been around
cameras. And you, as spetsiaist should have to understand that I
wrote about sharpening hover in the viewing mode through the display.
Because as it was on fixed sites. I wish you well.
User Rating: 123-04-2008 / well
Full tufta objects altogether, I am on mylnitse and the photos turn
out better, with the lenses may not even take pictures! I would
try another object!
User Rating: 123-04-2008 / Nobody
Podsazhite stand as the object focus on bezkonechnos
|