User Rating: 110-08-2008 / Den
Yul "4ik from and correctly, whose b. there is not talked about as a snapshot 40 and 400 have RA3NYE they compare with what was on my 400 and lens 70-200 L4, now is not naraduyus, but not very 28-135 lens, he did not rulit with 40 and 70-200 to 400, spruce to turn autofocus, to require 40 L optics and everything will be cool

User Rating: 108-08-2008 / Volodimir
Koristuyus 40 - yu 5 months, but ? such problems. If a piece of cloth then молодої Satin виходить after printing vid rozhevogo to buzkovogo Colors (особливо надворі. Компі at біленька.Всі sprobi корекції під hour printing успіхом not увінчались. Дякую

User Rating: 308-08-2008 / Yul "4ik
Finally acquired this miracle technique. After the first shooting upset, quality is not impressed (was filmed in a green mode, because not yet read the instruction). With each new shooting falls in love with him more and more hand-setting simply song! Since the lens oblazhalas slightly (EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM), took similar to the fudzhikom 9500. The problem was filmed in close premises in full growth, and even now I want shirokougolnik, and macro slabovato.
18-04-2008 / Vladimir-funny, but when it comes to kill 5 hours to process 1 Romer photos for tea, then you begin to hate those who need this shot. With 40 on such a mountain with shoulder problems piled up.
In short downloaded from the joy, all advise to take!

User Rating: 107-08-2008 / Kostya
I wish класний photos, and linzochku good for home podskazhyte ask ......
- Nikon D60-body +18-200 vr???
- Canon 450D-body +17-40/4 L???
- Canon D40 KIT, I do not pros, but the notion of photographs is horoshoe.Primerno at $ 1700. Podskazhyte please people .... SPS!

User Rating: 106-08-2008 / Gluck
About shutter noise - you nasmeshili me, you listened to his columns company when Scott at maximum volume? Believe me, I like to listen to grass rustle. In doing so, the person next to the camera, shutter, together with cotton mirrors little heard. And in the mode of Live View - well, you ticking mechanical watch heard - roughly the same

User Rating: 106-08-2008 / Gluck
The main advantage - a motorized mirror and greater weight to the camera, thus avoiding shevelenki where it easily caught with a slight Canon 400D. Even with two booster akkumami not saved. : (

User Rating: 106-08-2008 / Gluck
It was on my Canon 400D and 350D, then fall into the hands of sorokovka - everything - I realized what I really missed in previous cameras. If the 350 - the first picture on the head better than the 400 - the first, especially disappointed noises at 400 - m. The fact that the camera I am heartened by the day, more and more. Noises in 3200 Iso is, but not as terrible as they say. Even compared with 1600 at 350 - m they are less, not to mention about 800 to 400 Iso - m. Office considerably easier, just staggering, as I have previously shot at 350 - m;)

User Rating: 105-08-2008 / Nobody
J e b onsu.A where eyes were? We have to check it all, and not to move to buy today, go for it to the autonomy of the n n e sure to 100%

User Rating: -126-07-2008 / Jbons
Guys pomoymu full reg, 40D acquired before that there was and 20D (not yet managed to sell) as compared to rely (a optics 24-70/2, 8L) with a tripod, all indicators (was filmed in manuale), sensitivity, balance - shorter than that there to speak his mind, I COMPLETE OBLOM 40 - ka agio MYLO complete with full, 20 - ka rulit at full pronrame (given the fact that it is already two years wedding, studio .... 150 thousand srab. shutter). Yes faster, so less noise in 1600, less exposure to so wrong, so like poshire range, the display in question (and more soap as the camera itself). But QUALITY (detail, color, working out of shadows, even worse balance) full izvenite ha .. about. I love and respect Kenon but 40 - Tokyo galimaya matrix. Nada take 5D - this apparatus all times and peoples.

User Rating: 101-07-2008 / Nobody
U 400D 60.000 operation.
Tech. documentation for spare parts;)

User Rating: 128-06-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______
100 000 positives shutter only for the 40-D, and only for 2 - x years. How many of the D 400 and D 450 will not tell anybody, even on the site of the manufacturer and service center. But the promised free replacement if the camera on a formal guarantee.

User Rating: 127-06-2008 / Alex
100 000 positives for the 400d? This is a bad thing if so it is. I now read somewhere that he does not exceed 30 thousand, then bolt need to change. And at the 40d resource shutter about 200 thousand operation. Specify - no official figures.

User Rating: 127-06-2008 / Denis
But it is indeed a very interesting vopros.Nigde pochemuto openly about resource shutter pochemuto pishut.Po at least not in the instructions nor 40D nor 400D do not napisali.Iz not very reliable sources learned that the resource 400D least srabatyvaniy.A are about 100000 40D pochemuto did not know this resource is managed while the camera certainly be bolshe.Neponimayu why such manufacturers as Canon to hide such data because obviously the company produced the test of art shutter until the first refusal.

User Rating: 126-06-2008 / mila
All greetings! Reb damage from the table fotik recently ... like everything is working normally, but there is a feeling that something loose inside ... is small. Is there any meaning to bear in service? If so, подскажите normal, kommrchesky, who quickly diagnosed and complies work if needed.

User Rating: 126-06-2008 / Nobody
you forget about resource shutter. U amateur zerkalok he poluprofov lower than at almost 10 times.

User Rating: 126-06-2008 / Denis
And what potvoemu this gives the right to zadirat 40D ISO up to 3200? Shumit your 40D at 3200 even stronger than my old S3 IS at 400! And in 1600 matrix 40D shumit.Vzvesil I harrakteristikah and the difference in the price and took a 400D. A sense overpay? Want couple steeper take full matrix (as they go from kenone EOS5D pomoymu). And if can not afford to 40D then you are not concerned pomozhet.Kakieb there mikrolinzy not put-Krop has Krop! Yes, and generally being here zhelezo.Esli obektvy Elki and photographer if he is currently professor that the 400D that the 40D such pictures that will make them famous and "NAMES" pozaviduyut.
So frankly meaningless if the dispute can not see! 40D better course no dispute! Eslib Interestingly, it was vice versa then why pay more? I just say that the surcharge is really not worth the benefits that gives 40D. A general Canon RULIT! Building pervoklasnaya! At Quality altitude! Well shorter Canon is certainly Kenon.Hotya Pentaks K10 D much less K20 D better!
Sincerely Denis.

User Rating: 125-06-2008 / Maxim
Matrix in 400D and 40D different. In 40D applies DORABOTANNAYA matrix of the 400D. In particular, it increased the size mikrolinz that positively affects the level of noise.

User Rating: 125-06-2008 / Denis
OBSALYUTNO согласен.Ну now as can be the difference if the matrix that the 40D that the 400D-the same! Yes tomuzhe to 40% image quality in optics! A ostalnve 60% in the matrix, Nu-and of course the most important professianalizm and skills of the photographer!
So of course better to take a good professor lenses! By tomuzh who decides if Change sprinkle on the full-matrix (such EOS5D) lenses that remain.
Comrades and D i neslushayte mu!
Real difference if you feel 40D and 5D сравнивать.Но is a very different price segment!
Undoubtedly 40D faster than the 400D has more extra funkchiy.Imeet more capacitive battery and удобней.Но now ODINAKOVOE quality photos!

User Rating: 323-06-2008 / leonid
My friend bought my recommendation for this miracle technology with lenses 17-85 and 28-200. And gave me poyuzat. Staff super even to find fault with what is not. Was shot in the most difficult conditions in contre-light shooting, urchin night automation works super marriage no one badly that banduras large.
I'm very accustomed to G9 Compact. Previously did not think that is changing at zerkalku. But D40 each image - a masterpiece.

User Rating: 121-06-2008 / Yaroslav
Nemogu detected 40d or d200 ((((

User Rating: 119-06-2008 / Igor
At samoa to the difference between 40 and 400 is very difficult indeed to see! because in these cells is the same matrix, and the difference only in vnutrikamernom protsesore. I shot 40 and - o and 400 - o and ascertained that the difference (with good optics) only in comfort. photos virtually no difference in sight.

User Rating: 116-06-2008 / Діма
If you want a take-професійно Verkhovna як minimum 40 d then muscho потім буде тільки біда a penny. I mav 350 e але потім after nedovgogo klatsanya побачив що його треба skorenko продавати,,,

User Rating: 116-06-2008 / Dima
Those sho not write on рахунок sho will not різниці між 40 and 400 is not much I помиляєшсь at своєму досвіді perekonavsya що optics L реалізує themselves Verkhovna професійного класу. I do not треба тішити people ... Бути blame гармонія optics with Verkhovna, znovush the "experience"

User Rating: 110-06-2008 / ______ ALEXANDER PERVYY_______
Camera good, but they still need to be able to take pictures! His weight without batteries about 800 grams, plus battery plus lens. We have finally 1.5-2 kg (depending on the weight of the lens).
Therefore, some may receive nerezkie shots.
And in my street lighting CANON S3 IS sorokovke inferior, and that talk of shooting on the premises? Here is where all the apparent advantages "zerkalki": You can shoot in RAW, you can raise a higher ISO without fear of noises, rapid autofocus (when tsifrozum does not give confirmation focusing, "zerkalka" normal FOKUSIRUETSYA BY 9 KRESTOVYH SENSORS), weight custom regimes, setting the color temperature in Kelvin, etc. and so on.

User Rating: 110-06-2008 / Yury
Please advise!
I work on public pressure - a freelance photographer. Over 3 years otschelkal kenonom A520 about 70 thousand pictures. Read the accounts in a variety of conditions and a variety of things: concerts, competitions, rallies, demonstrations and other public events and winter and summer, and outdoor and indoor, as well as portraits for the site, newspapers and other things. There is even a wall calendar with my pictures. In short range of topics and shooting conditions I have bezgranichen. A camera is not my pulls all this pressure: Images in concert halls, with the weak coverage - complete nonsense, in the gym well as (good shots can be obtained only going directly to the playground removing from a distance of 2 meters, but it is full and complete picture of extreme events coverage), which skips a lot because of its low rate mylnitsy. In short, it is a shame to spend so much wasted time and effort to substandard images. In recent times, adhering to the boss about buying a new machine. Like agreed to allocate 30 -35 thousand river. Said that I identified with the model. And it must be said that besides this mylnitsy nothing I have not enjoyed, and in models of cameras does not disassemble. A need to understand and learn to work with the more serious equipment. Now look to the EOS 40D - just in this price range. But something on it reviews on this site is not very (overall impression) ... I watched the test and they made shots - in the afternoon street lighting my canon A520 practice

User Rating: 129-05-2008 / Nobody
Quality competitor Pentaks k20d. 15 mpikseley high robochie sources are cheaper because pentakse zero PR advertising, I choose Pentaks

User Rating: 126-05-2008 / d e n
Slishal че in the 30d is a big matrix, with a lower megapixel gives less noise, 30 and 40 in the same number of points of focus?

User Rating: 125-05-2008 / kuzik-tv
There are test shots Canon 40D, optics canon 17-40mm f / 4 L + Jupiter 37 A 135 / 3.5.
http://kuzik-tv.io.ua/album.php

User Rating: 120-05-2008 / Lelik
all all have said.
also rvalsya for 30 D, I have in store for him - and me 40 guys there - ku offer only $ 150 more expensive, which refuses maniac?
Yes, gentlemen - this is just a song! not without shoals, of course: parshivenky display, not turning, but the contrary - a lever ON-OFF! free simply shoved her handbag in need carefully to avoid ON! -- Well, not on the ground, he! and the rest - !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, like any CANON. And about the price of our motherland - ......( pi-pi-pi ...)

User Rating: 115-05-2008 / fotomagnat
All recommend fotik! Only now the price as always bent unreal! ZAbugrom $ 1100 is already a long time ... and we as always .... we are greater than they earn, we cool!

User Rating: 114-05-2008 / Max
Very satisfied, until then enjoyed 350D, thought to move to 30D, but both simultaneously and compared the surcharge:)
In his hand is how to join.
Of the minuses - displeychik parshivy, does not assess the quality of images.
Autofocus mazhet much less, but it is

Objects need, of course, the appropriate class technology. 17-40L - budget L, it must be understood.
16-35L at the time.

RAW will not open in CS2, or go to CS3 native DPP

User Rating: 113-05-2008 / Igor
:) If you say so, then it is you do not otolete! I like 99.8% photos without ImageMaster.

User Rating: 111-05-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY_____
For Archie.
Thanks for your reply. And what exactly is coming to plug PHOTOSHOP CS2? We are updating software, but buzuspeshno. Or still needs PHOTOSHOP CS3?

User Rating: 106-05-2008 / Archi
For _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY_____
Ravi from sorokovki as models and later opened an appropriate time without any problems ON !!!!! Photoshop plug without TSS2 not open these equals, as well as Fotoshop 6 did not open the files with 400 d!! It must be understood. That equals more different not only in size but also in structure might be. Update the software and you will not any problem!! )))

User Rating: 124-04-2008 / Nobody
I have already answered. With performance-place for itself if they thoroughly explored, so little zaroetes not seem, and even then you will be kicking in the forums from side to side that the Chamber "and" such a parameter by 1% better than at the camera "b." therefore it needs to buy it.

User Rating: 123-04-2008 / Julia
Cenzor thank you very much for advice. I consider it. And if taking 40D, the lens to it you can take that same-that you are advised (optional)? It may even tell where you can explore the details, that means those cameras or other characteristics.

User Rating: 123-04-2008 / Cenzor
I recommend to consider option D 400 (without lens fitting "body") + separately good lens, tentatively Canon EF 17-40 mm f/4L (about 800 USD). This lens professional level with good study of details that reveal almost the entire potential embodied in the mirror chamber. His fast autofocus will allow excess voltage to withdraw without children, and close range focus the need for landscape photography. On the night shooting does not say, because under the original digital photograph it poorly adapted (unlike the film with excerpts increase is the accumulation of noise), but in any case result in the output will be disproportionately better than with the usual mylnitsy.
Option D instead of buying 40 D 400, while maintaining in a package deal of the lens recommend in the case unless impinges on the budget. Frankly, the optics of such a class win between 400 D and 40 D will be only in terms of amenities.

User Rating: 122-04-2008 / Julia
Thank you for responding. Was shot and removed a digital Olympus C-765 Ultra Zoom. Three years. Fetching it all possible and impossible. I like to photograph landscapes, nature, children, night shooting, etc. I would like to approach the matter more professionally. And like quality pictures.

User Rating: 120-04-2008 / Nobody
Julia, what filmed earlier and how many years?

User Rating: 120-04-2008 / Julia
Guys подскажите please, whether or not to take this apparatus. I am a fan. I would like to engage more professional photography. Accordingly want high-quality cadres.
Or is dwell on something simpler?

User Rating: 118-04-2008 / Vladimir
"-and ImageMaster processing and other nonsense frankly already get so serious and buy equipment to make less potet over the manufacture of bullets themselves guess what ..." -- No matter how ridiculous, but without these programs, you pool is not otolete.

User Rating: 117-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Yul "4ik.
It is gratifying to be useful. And you, Yul "4ik for professional or recreational purposes take 40 D?

User Rating: 116-04-2008 / Yul "4ik
_____ALEKSANDR PERVYY______ Thank you for such a detailed explanation, I need to be made in replacement lenses and apparatus has not entirely amateur, and it is very bysro entire study, and ImageMaster processing and other nonsense frankly already get so serious and buy equipment to make less potet the manufacture of bullets themselves guess what ...

User Rating: 109-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Arch.
Have you tried using CAMERA RAW (Photoshop CS2) to open RAW? My friend's 40 D and opens only native software.

User Rating: 109-04-2008 / Arch
I liked the 40 d! Kleven camera. In his hand is excellent, though rukoyat still need to buy, heavy - no mean extra shevelenki, fast autofocus, a great brain. They enjoyed working. Let Quality is not a 5 e. .. but this is understandable, different classes, but compared with my former e 350 is just sky!

07-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY_____
For Yul "4ik.
Lights lens is characterized by its relative value holes. Applies. hole lens (LLC) is written as a fraction and shows the current ratio between the diameter lens to its focal length. What is more important Ltd., the more "aperture" will be the lens.
EF 50mm f/1.4 USM-over lens aperture, the same with a fixed focal length. Do not write, because people can laugh down (not offend, please), we talk about intensity (and it is inextricably linked to the diaphragm, GRIP, FR, EFR, etc.) .. but it does not have semi-camera. Buying a camera, you need to have at least a minimum knowledge. Yet you will have to handle photos (convert RAW), to work in PHOTOSHOP. Otherwise, what is the point of purchase such a camera?
With EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM tab to read the 400 D. It is written in detail.

User Rating: 107-04-2008 / Nobody
I poturyalasya, ibid in numbers, all written, but if you do not understand the so-take-mylnitsu, but most say professional

User Rating: 107-04-2008 / Yul "4ik
And what will obektivchik poluchshe EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM or shtatnik EF 50mm f/1.4 USM? Less tsifer - better? And what more luminous, where 5.6 or 1.4?

User Rating: 104-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY______
For Yul "4ik.
I worked, kratkovremmeno, only with two lenses (see 400 D), so I can not tell here, because find himself in the search. I could rewrite the characteristics of, but do not do that. Therefore, there will not be able to tell (I check the theory of practice and vice versa).
CANON 17-40 F / 4 L liked me, but someone wrote that he was not very. WHY?
Exploring lenses CANON, I have come to a simple conclusion. I would classify them into 3-type lenses, regardless of focal length:
1. Cheap, or budget. They can be identified by the scale of distances and the lack of weak intensity.
2. L optics, the highest class. Dear lenses.
3. The average rate as for the price, both in intensity.
Can someone tell useful on the topic?

User Rating: 103-04-2008 / Yul "4ik
Thanks to Alexander _ Pervomu_. Read a lot of feedback, such as referred to the Canon EOS 40D, left to suffocate his "frog". Now the next question: what he needs lens? Macro-and televiki this because ... Portretnik this too well, but! I would portretik, and peyzazhika posnimat, but did not take universalku Cracks. That's what I cormorant nicety. Thank you in advance!

User Rating: 102-04-2008 / _____ ALEXANDER PERVYY_____
For Yul "4ik.
I just twice shot 40 D with your friends, but like the camera.
The technical side.
Quick autofocus. Nearly 6 frames \ s, a large buffer memory for JPEG, RAW.
ISO 800, 1000 workshop, almost no noise.
And, in general, ISO regimes in the creative zone can be installed with step 1 / 3 of 100 to 1600 (100, 125, 160, 200, 250, 320, 400, 500, 640, 800, 1000, 1250, 1600). It's quite convenient.
There are "Priority light tones." Installation of color temperature in Kelvin from 2500 to 10000 K with a step 100 K. An interesting possibility: fork together in the white balance (BB) can be set correction and BB shooting with automatic de bracketing, and then shot 1 for 9 images will be written. In doing so, decreasing speed serial shooting.
3 installation (custom) at the wheel of governance, where you can save different settings (sharpness, contrast, nasyschennsti, color tone, the style for each Picture Style), and then when photographing not to change settings on the fly, but simply to select the appropriate setting. Picture Style-6 plant.
There is a Live View, tentative recovery mirrors and other hands but before it does not survived. Safe corpus.

User Rating: 102-04-2008 / Igor
Yes, the matrix of 40 - Pack is the same as in the 400 e. This is a fact

User Rating: 101-04-2008 / Yul "4ik
I want a quick-shooting machine for children, sports, photographing, in dark rooms and other "adverse conditions". My Fudzhik S9500 slow and almost always miss the time, and noise in a room at ISO400-horror. Thousands more Machine 1500 cu can not afford, given the fact that there are still obektivchik and FIFa outbreak.
Encourage, please, what to choose: Canon EOS 30D, 40D, 400D / Nikon 80d, or even what the other?
If you lead a double-technical arguments SPASIB! (in English only know "niht fershteyn").

User Rating: 131-03-2008 / Nobody
sorokovke optimized for the matrix of 400 D, the main difference is reducing noise at iso 800 and above

User Rating: 129-03-2008 / ivanzai
did not understand how this is not a new matrix? In my matrix another - is, generally speaking, dozens of other ruler.

User Rating: 124-03-2008 / Klaust
In DFoto commissioned by the competing organizations have shown solid shortcomings, I would even say all this is overdone. Staff seems to me a very decent, there are certainly gaps, but for this price it has no equal. Incidentally, if view article in the journal "Photographic" the results of his vpechetlyayuschie.

User Rating: 113-03-2008 / fotogrits
Very superovy object to 40D floor anon24 S-70 mm

User Rating: 113-03-2008 / Vladislav
I am 40 - oy s24 August 2007 acquired a isprevyh. DOVOLEN! NOT RAZDUMYVAY

User Rating: 112-03-2008 / anonimous
universal Canon 24-105 f4L or Canon 17-55 f2.8 to start. more lives tell:)

User Rating: 108-03-2008 / Георгій
If staffing without сумніву 17-55, and then якщо кілька Lama himself head, Bo варіантів багато, wants to macro, shirik, television is вони ? ? фікс, and zoom, a photographer кожен має its думку, shorter calls for the eksperementuvati, хоча eksperimenti ці трохи задорогі.

User Rating: 108-03-2008 / sem
Give please what better object to the 40d FIFa

User Rating: 107-03-2008 / dmitry
bought 40 e, very happy. but the matrix found broken pkselov 9 (not tested immediately apparatus and when kinulsya already passed repayment period remains apply only to a service center), generally nibut who faced such a problem does not tell what can be done, and this nonsense altogether removed from the matrix, at how much further it can affect the quality of images? Thanks in advance

User Rating: 102-03-2008 / Dima
By indexing is not exactly opredelish, perhaps only for themselves if the new camera. I have replaced the central charges such as indexing and went again. I am sure if pereproshit it simply goes too anew.

User Rating: 127-02-2008 / Sergey
Use a long time 350d. Now moved to 40d.
Many here discussing about excellent choice - 400d, I agree money machine for their good, but convenient to keep it in the hands of BB can not be without. Total additional $ 150 Akkamulyatory AA + (6 pieces) 30 $. Or additional native (goes expensive). A 40d in the arm rests quite comfortably and akkamulyator it better.
Total: the difference is not doubled. It may be a long talk about technical specifications, but my feelings, 40d at the moment I am fully satisfied, and 400d looks near as infant toys. Good photos can be obtained from the two cameras, but with more demands and sereznymy optics much better 40d.

User Rating: 109-02-2008 / kuzik-tv
No-can not decide to take 30 or 40 e d.Raznitsa in price substantially, but opinions about 40 vke not very vpechatlyayut.Posovetuyte what did get better ... And if any sense to take the carcass with shtatnikami that vparivayut? Not better to take the normal optics?

User Rating: 105-02-2008 / Георгій
Taking a Canon EOS 40D dokupiv, як staffing EF-S 17-55/2, 8 IS USM, зараз chergova sore: який взяти об'єктиви for the portrait, macro is shirki? H e lp!!!

User Rating: 128-01-2008 / Nobody
different, but up to 400 images indistinguishable research. Do not forget that in 40 e do not have a new matrix, a matrix of 400 D, only refined processing algorithms and 14 bit interpretation.

User Rating: 122-01-2008 / Nobody
that over the beast indexing images? how do you know?

User Rating: 122-01-2008 / Vladimir
At the 30d 15000 for 9 months

User Rating: 117-01-2008 / Серега
simply determine the number of positives - by indexing snapshot. I now like to otschelkal 400D 16000 images.

User Rating: 117-01-2008 / to: Anatoly
Canon EOS 40D is not perceived kompom.kak disc,
- and they do not have. Take a soft place or have full-card-reader

menu structure complexity,
as in the brand-3 - topmark prof.kamere

to highlight avtofok.nado open outbreak,
- in the dark - naturally. and that there is a camera which leads in the darkness Satellite?

Work to correct only if avtofok.garantiruetsya aperture lenses,
-- Complete garbage, at any works fine

in a word crude camera.
-- In a word obsirat need to motivate and not from baldy

User Rating: 114-01-2008 / KlenK
According to the latest tests Dfoto 4 Ball Neochen ... Better - but more expensive than eos400 tomzhe worse in class than nikon d80

User Rating: 108-01-2008 / ALEXANDER FIRST
Give, please, as you have identified the number of personnel withdrawn? Sellers in the store were not able to show me the number of positives at any shutter 400 D, or the 40 D. I still can not choose between these 2 devices. By the way, you are happy with his sharpness JPEG, or more frequently shooting in RAW?

User Rating: 308-01-2008 / uncleSergey
Test for Canon 40D in DFOTO, unfortunately, "fine", felt the order. Even the format of the magazine declined. A review of fotiku read in Digitalphotografer. Incidentally, there is very good pristoynye obzory.Ochen machine! And if you're not working LiveVeiw, well then, the hands they are such that there will understand that this is .... ... I saw it as a system disk. How do you connect what place?

User Rating: 106-01-2008 / Nobody
Really pay for:
-- Rate (6 to 3 fps at 400 D)
-- Magnesium corpus against the plastic at 400 D (although they can stitch nuts if desired)
-- A bright viewfinder size
-- A more powerful battery, compared with 400 D
-- More zhivuchy (on assurances from developers) in resource shutter 100 thousand positives (in truth, my backup 400 - ka otschelkala 67 thousand and until 3 * pah)
-- A short excerpt in 1 / 8000 sec to 1 / 4000 from 400 D
-- The possibility of changing the sensitivity with a short interval of one foot (plus expansion up to 3200 ISO) against trehstopnogo interval and the upper milestone in the ISO 1600 at 400 D
-- The second wheel control

Plus pay for:
-- Uhvatisty corpus (those for whom size is important * *)
-- Live - vyu (with the loss autofocus) - imho atavizm mylnits
-- 14 bit RAW (whose range does not cover virtually none of the printers available today beyond the mere mortals professional printing, in most fotolabov including)
-- 3 "screen with a diluted (230 thousand pixels) resolution

User Rating: 106-01-2008 / Tokarev AS
Prosvjeta. I never understood so different than 400 D and 40 D that they were the difference in price twice? It is worth it? And unless the absence of turning the screen just annoys me? For such money!

User Rating: 105-01-2008 / Nobody
The camera really dampish. By sootnosheniyayu price / quality tridtsadka today looks much more attractive, without marketing layvvyu (somebody has it, if not turning the screen? Land will not, still need to inclined), 14 bit equal to (I did not notice the difference if honest, only to very bright sites they have with careful consideration, but the printer kills these differences podchistuyu), did not rate 6.5 frames per second (zhpeg achieved only at such speed) and 6 ... Resource shutter 100 thousand and still is. I made a few shots in the shop and house has considered me-they were not surprised. Decided that taking the 30 ku-time-tested machine, and then will be seen.

User Rating: 104-01-2008 / Anatoliy
Canon EOS 40D is not perceived kompom.kak drive, LCD screen is not protected, no meh.povorota / tilt, in autofocus mode feature Live View does not work, the structure of menu complexity, there is no wireless control outbreaks, to highlight avtofok.nado open outbreak, correct avtofok.garantiruetsya work only with aperture lenses, camera in one word syraya.Esli in the next model will attend these shortcomings mean more satisfied with the number of Canon, Nikon kachestvo.U but as for me, everything is not so. By the article to add clarity, I priverzhenets Canon and wanted to buy this kameru.Spasibo DFOTO authoritative edition of 12.2007 g for an objective assessment.

User Rating: 102-01-2008 / Frog
Installed programs and the enclosed disc, but when connected to the Maku do not see each other. Who nibut there are such problems?

User Rating: 131-12-2007 / nideKer
Yes, after 350 and - this beast:) - there is only one "drawback" - a heavy ... -- Although I quickly used. to the management after 350 tki tyazhelovato accustomed - although all are much easier and access to basic settings rather quickly - conveniently manage even in woollen gloves.

Regarding the noise - I can only compare with 350 tkoy)))) - not words - and nothing to compare .. ;) Did a few shots with sensitivity 3200 - struck me the result!

camera impressive quality images.

Incidentally read in the last dizhital and photo camera "review and test 40 e" - a bit upset and hesitate to take that 400 or 40 ... -- But revered http://www.dpreview.com/ - vsezhe raskashelilsya at 40 ku - not regret nor skolechki!

User Rating: 130-12-2007 / oleg
Once all waited decent TTS televisions.
Now waiting for the ideal tsifrovika.I so all his life. Withdraw need.
U D40-quality picture for a very normal price. White balance - voshititelen. noises - at 800 - the wedding off (20D-400). D3 Nikon - another class. Closer to 5D (but for a different price). Following a change of the matrix is like a picture Canon. Well, can still pomeryaemsya cables?

User Rating: 008-12-2007 / RediskA
Where can be noises from zerkalki? You че - kidding? Ggggg :)))))

User Rating: 118-11-2007 / Lena
We already with her husband two days did not produce the miracle of the hands. Very happy. Since Canon has been working three years. Before this film was. In this like all - ergonomics, a good overview viewfinder, autofocus tenacious. After the film particularly struck rate, even without the inclusion of the series. Yesterday tried to svadbe.Fotografii - super! The adjustment required a little. In the street - ISO 100, in ZAKSe - 200. Shumov - 0. Love is also a natural colour. Who else doubted forward!

User Rating: 104-11-2007 / Nobody
The size of the sensor from CANON 400D and 40D-identical 22.2 h14, 8 (incidentally, this value is present in the description on this site), sprinkle Factor 1.6.
The difference is D-40 spot metering, aftofokusirovki other system (see answers below Cenzor a), the regime LiveView (photo viewing and histogram mode realenogo time), you can set up 3 custom configuration management on the wheel, you can ask Kelvin temperature (this is for subsequent processing in the photo), slightly more options in setting the styles of images, the new processor, the regime greater detail in the transmission of light tones, supposedly more resources shutter and several more factors. But I, too, and compare these models 2 and 2 and still not made a choice. Incidentally, in your lens is not wide angle at converting receive 38-168 (do not forget to recalculate!). ---- I ---------------------- I
I _______________ I
I! ! I
I! 22,2 h14, 8 mm! I
I! ! I
I !_____________! I
I I
I ---------------------- I
The image size on the film 35 mm
36h24 mm
I jotted shemku, because sprinkle question-factor wondered constantly! Inside the image size digital camera.

User Rating: 102-11-2007 / Peter
Vcheras quarter of the owner of a miracle, lens Sigma 17-70! compared with my 400 D, just bomb! all recommend!

User Rating: 130-10-2007 / Sergey
Interestingly talk. It turns out that 40D - amateur level, and 400D - for pros. However pereubezhdat you do not want: each thinks the best of their promiscuity and education.

I bought this devays and nenaraduyus. Though the difference with the 30D is not so great, but a number of parameters (focus, processing images, rate, availability sRAW, LiveVeiw) worth of overpayment. Especially as in my case - a total of 130 cu ;)

As for the religious dispute, he ended for me compared to the menu and taking devaysov in hand. Sorokovka behind as native.

User Rating: 120-10-2007 / vitamin
Daaaa ergonomics camera - just obaldet!
especially as the growth of images from predecessors did not notice - but the body is just a song!

User Rating: 105-10-2007 / Nobody
Even with pre raised mirror camera will not be totally silent. Clicking the shutter in full silence heard at a distance of several meters, under normal circumstances one and a half or two meters.